WEALTH TEAM DEVELOPMENT LTD v. CHOI CHUNG CHING

WEALTH TEAM DEVELOPMENT LTD v. CHOI CHUNG CHING

The injunction was continued because there was a serious issue to be tried, the plaintiff demonstrated a strong case in nuisance and a real threat to its business that could not be adequately remedied by damages, and continuation did not create new inconvenience given the identical landlord injunction.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
WEALTH TEAM DEVELOPMENT LTD v. CHOI CHUNG CHING
Parties
Plaintiff: Wealth Team Development Limited; Defendant: Choi Chung Ching
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
22 April 2003
Case Number
HCA4865/2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Nuisance and Injunction / Application for Continuation of Interim Injunction; Reasons for Decision
Outcome
Injunction continued; costs reserved
Legal Topics
Nuisance, Injunction, Breach of Covenant, Interim Relief, Costs
Source Language
en
Tort Property Civil Procedure Equity Nuisance Injunction Breach of Covenant Interim Relief +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Wealth Team Development Limited

Plaintiff

Choi Chung Ching

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Nuisance and Injunction / Application for Continuation of Interim Injunction; Reasons for Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant's activities constitute a nuisance to the plaintiff's development and justify injunctive relief
  2. 2 Whether damages would be an adequate remedy or if an injunction is necessary to prevent irreparable harm to plaintiff's business
  3. 3 Whether screening of the premises negates the need for an injunction

Ratio Decidendi

The injunction was continued because there was a serious issue to be tried, the plaintiff demonstrated a strong case in nuisance and a real threat to its business that could not be adequately remedied by damages, and continuation did not create new inconvenience given the identical landlord injunction.

Court Disposition

Injunction continued; costs reserved

Orders

  • Continuation of the plaintiff's injunction restraining the defendant from holding mock or real funerals, playing funeral music, displaying signs advertising funeral and mourning services, displaying altars or burning materials, building furnaces for such burning, and displaying funeral banners, paper effigies or...
  • Costs reserved