WIN WAVE INDUSTRIAL LTD v. GOSBON INDUSTRIES LTD AND OTHERS
Leave to appeal was granted because the intended appeals had a more than reasonable prospect of success; Gosbon's out-of-time application was allowed on the basis of merits; the order was found to be problematic insofar as it effectively awarded both return of the initial deposit and damages, and the matter of apportionment/indemnity between Gosbon and the estate agents warranted appeal; a partial stay of execution was granted against Gosbon to the extent of HKD 500,000.
- Citation
- WIN WAVE INDUSTRIAL LTD v. GOSBON INDUSTRIES LTD AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Win Wave Industrial Limited; 1st Defendant: Gosbon Industries Limited; 2nd Defendant: Centaline Property Agency Limited; 3rd Defendant: Chung Mei Wah; 4th Defendant: Lai Yiu Kai Alan
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 2009
- Case Number
- DCCJ209/2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action / Post Judgment Application for Leave to Appeal (including Out of Time) and Stay of Execution
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted to the defendants; Gosbon's out-of-time application allowed; partial stay of execution granted against Gosbon for HKD 500,000; appeals permitted to proceed.
- Legal Topics
- Rescission, Return of Deposit, Damages, Indemnity, Apportionment, Stay of Execution, Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Win Wave Industrial Limited
Plaintiff
Gosbon Industries Limited
1st Defendant
Centaline Property Agency Limited
2nd Defendant
Chung Mei Wah
3rd Defendant
Lai Yiu Kai Alan
4th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Action / Post Judgment Application for Leave to Appeal (including Out of Time) and Stay of Execution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether defendants should be granted leave to appeal including out-of-time application by Gosbon
- 2 Whether the trial court's order awarding both return of deposit and damages was problematic
- 3 Proper remedy following rescission: return of deposit or damages in lieu
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was granted because the intended appeals had a more than reasonable prospect of success; Gosbon's out-of-time application was allowed on the basis of merits; the order was found to be problematic insofar as it effectively awarded both return of the initial deposit and damages, and the matter of apportionment/indemnity between Gosbon and the estate agents warranted appeal; a partial stay of execution was granted against Gosbon to the extent of HKD 500,000.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted to the defendants; Gosbon's out-of-time application allowed; partial stay of execution granted against Gosbon for HKD 500,000; appeals permitted to proceed.
Orders
- Declaration that Win Wave was entitled to rescind and has validly rescinded the provisional agreement and is entitled to return of the initial deposit of HK$500,000
- Judgment against the four Defendants for damages in the sum of HK$505,060 and interest at the judgment rate from the date of writ until payment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment