RE FIVE LAKES INVESTMENT CO LTD
Petitioner established a believable prima facie case for a just and equitable winding-up based on alleged misappropriation, denial of access to books, loss of mutual confidence and operational deadlock; balancing commercial realities and urgency the court must appoint an independent provisional liquidator to hold...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- RE FIVE LAKES INVESTMENT CO LTD
- Parties
- Petitioner: Gala Land Investment Co. Ltd.; Opposing Contributory: Octaland Holdings (H.K.) Ltd.; Official Receiver: Official Receiver; Company (subject of Winding Up Petitions): Five Lakes Investment Company Limited; Company (subject of Winding Up Petitions): Multiford Company Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 26 October 1983
- Case Number
- HCCW78/1983
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding Up) Petitions Under Companies Ordinance (cap.32) / Interim Applications: Appointment of Provisional Liquidators and Application Under S.182 for Exoneration of Payments (applications Heard Together Before Substantive Hearing)
- Outcome
- Consolidation of petitions; provisional liquidators appointed for Five Lakes and Multiford; application under section 182 dismissed; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up, Provisional Liquidator, Just and Equitable Winding Up, Section 182 Companies Ordinance, Section 193 Companies Ordinance, Directors' Inspection Rights, Deadlock and Management Paralysis
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gala Land Investment Co. Ltd.
Petitioner
Octaland Holdings (H.K.) Ltd.
Opposing Contributory
Official Receiver
Official Receiver
Five Lakes Investment Company Limited
Company (subject of Winding Up Petitions)
Multiford Company Limited
Company (subject of Winding Up Petitions)
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) Petitions Under Companies Ordinance (cap.32) / Interim Applications: Appointment of Provisional Liquidators and Application Under S.182 for Exoneration of Payments (applications Heard Together Before Substantive Hearing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether petitioner established a prima facie case for a winding-up order under the just and equitable provision
- 2 Whether a provisional liquidator should be appointed pending the hearing
- 3 Whether the section 182 application to authorise routine outgoings should be granted in lieu of appointing a provisional liquidator
Ratio Decidendi
Petitioner established a believable prima facie case for a just and equitable winding-up based on alleged misappropriation, denial of access to books, loss of mutual confidence and operational deadlock; balancing commercial realities and urgency the court must appoint an independent provisional liquidator to hold the companies' affairs pending the substantive hearing, and accordingly the section 182 exoneration application is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Consolidation of petitions; provisional liquidators appointed for Five Lakes and Multiford; application under section 182 dismissed; costs reserved.
Orders
- Consolidation of the two winding-up petitions for Five Lakes Investment Company Limited and Multiford Company Limited
- Dismissal of the application under section 182 for exoneration of proposed payments
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment