RE MAINTAIN PROFITS LTD AND OTHERS
The Registrar refused to revise the taxed charge-out rates after applying the Law Society scale as a reference and the seven factors globally: Mr. Kemp's rate was fixed at HKD 4,200 per hour and Mr. Stranger's at HKD 2,100 per hour, and the applications for review of those rates were refused.
- Citation
- RE MAINTAIN PROFITS LTD AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Company (subject of Winding Up): Maintain Profits Limited; Company (subject of Winding Up): Myriad Gold Corporation; Company (subject of Winding Up): B.F. Construction Co. Ltd.; Solicitors (applicant for Review): Messrs. Stephenson Harwood & Lo
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2006
- Case Number
- HCCW346/2004
- Procedural Posture
- Companies Winding Up Proceedings / Taxation Review Decision (registrar Review of Solicitors' Bills)
- Outcome
- Application for review of charge-out rates refused in respect of the two fee-earners; rates maintained.
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up, Provisional Liquidation, Taxation of Costs, Hourly Rates, Law Society Scale
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Maintain Profits Limited
Company (subject of Winding Up)
Myriad Gold Corporation
Company (subject of Winding Up)
B.F. Construction Co. Ltd.
Company (subject of Winding Up)
Messrs. Stephenson Harwood & Lo
Solicitors (applicant for Review)
Procedural Posture
Companies Winding Up Proceedings / Taxation Review Decision (registrar Review of Solicitors' Bills)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the hourly rates claimed by the solicitors are reasonable and justified against the Law Society scale and market comparators
- 2 How the seven factors in Paragraph 2 Part II of the First Schedule to Order 62 should be applied in fixing charge-out rates
- 3 Appropriate hourly rates for a senior partner (Mr. Kemp) and an associate/paralegal turned solicitor (Mr. Stranger)
Ratio Decidendi
The Registrar refused to revise the taxed charge-out rates after applying the Law Society scale as a reference and the seven factors globally: Mr. Kemp's rate was fixed at HKD 4,200 per hour and Mr. Stranger's at HKD 2,100 per hour, and the applications for review of those rates were refused.
Court Disposition
Application for review of charge-out rates refused in respect of the two fee-earners; rates maintained.
Orders
- Application for review of the charge-out rates of Mr. Kemp and Mr. Stranger refused
- Costs of the review reserved pending decision on other items
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment