RE DIYON DEVELOPMENT LTD
The court was satisfied on balance sheet evidence, undertakings, and recent loan facilities that the Company is solvent and that the petitioning creditor's and supporting creditors' claims were paid or adequately provided for; the Official Receiver reported no need for investigation and the late, small-value claims...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- RE DIYON DEVELOPMENT LTD
- Parties
- Petitioner: Kong Yick Ming; Company: Diyon Development Limited; Parent Company: Magician Investments (BVI) Limited; Ultimate Parent Company: Magician Industries (Holdings) Limited; Supporting Creditor: Concept Developments Limited; Supporting Creditor: PME International Company Limited; Supporting Creditor: Fook Cheong Ho International Limited; Supporting Creditor: Techable Industrial Limited; Official Receiver: Official Receiver
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2006
- Case Number
- HCCW178/2006
- Procedural Posture
- Winding Up Petition (company) / Decision on Summons to Rescind Winding Up Order (hearing 20 October 2006)
- Outcome
- Winding-up order rescinded; petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up, Rescission, Solvency Test, Supporting Creditors, Substitution of Petitioner, Statutory Demand (s178), Disposition of Company Property (s182)
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kong Yick Ming
Petitioner
Diyon Development Limited
Company
Magician Investments (BVI) Limited
Parent Company
Magician Industries (Holdings) Limited
Ultimate Parent Company
Concept Developments Limited
Supporting Creditor
PME International Company Limited
Supporting Creditor
Fook Cheong Ho International Limited
Supporting Creditor
Techable Industrial Limited
Supporting Creditor
Official Receiver
Official Receiver
Procedural Posture
Winding Up Petition (company) / Decision on Summons to Rescind Winding Up Order (hearing 20 October 2006)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court may rescind an unsealed winding-up order where the company is solvent and petitioning and supporting creditors have been paid or adequately provided for
- 2 Whether the source of funds used to discharge the petitioning debt constitutes an unlawful disposition of company property (s182) or otherwise requires investigation
- 3 Whether late-filed supporting creditor claims indicate defective company records requiring investigation
Ratio Decidendi
The court was satisfied on balance sheet evidence, undertakings, and recent loan facilities that the Company is solvent and that the petitioning creditor's and supporting creditors' claims were paid or adequately provided for; the Official Receiver reported no need for investigation and the late, small-value claims did not undermine the accounts; accordingly the court exercised its jurisdiction to rescind the unsealed winding-up order and dismissed the petition.
Court Disposition
Winding-up order rescinded; petition dismissed
Orders
- Rescind the winding-up order made on 22 September 2006
- Dismiss the petition presented by the petitioner
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment