RE MOULIN GLOBAL EYECARE HOLDINGS LTD
HSBC had assigned its debts and was no longer a creditor; Standard Chartered was properly substituted as petitioner; the companies were shown to be insolvent with debts unpaid, the provisional liquidators identified no reason to continue provisional liquidation, and therefore the court must wind up the companies to permit adjudication of proofs and distribution of assets, with the petitioner's costs payable out of company assets.
- Citation
- RE MOULIN GLOBAL EYECARE HOLDINGS LTD
- Parties
- Petitioner: Standard Chartered Bank (HK) Ltd; Supporting Creditor (original Petitioner): HSBC; Respondent (company): Moulin Global Eyecare Holdings Limited (MGEH); Respondent (company): Moulin Global Eyecare Trading Limited (MGET); Respondent (company): Leadkeen Industrial Ltd; Provisional Liquidators: Provisional Liquidators; Official Receiver: Official Receiver
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 5 June 2006
- Case Number
- HCCW470/2005
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding Up) / Hearing for Winding Up Petitions — Order Made
- Outcome
- Winding-up orders made against Moulin Global Eyecare Holdings Limited, Moulin Global Eyecare Trading Limited and Leadkeen Industrial Ltd; Standard Chartered Bank (HK) Ltd substituted as petitioner; provisional liquidation ceased and companies to be wound up.
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up Petitions, Substitution of Petitioner, Provisional Liquidation, Assignment of Debts, Corporate Guarantees
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Standard Chartered Bank (HK) Ltd
Petitioner
HSBC
Supporting Creditor (original Petitioner)
Moulin Global Eyecare Holdings Limited (MGEH)
Respondent (company)
Moulin Global Eyecare Trading Limited (MGET)
Respondent (company)
Leadkeen Industrial Ltd
Respondent (company)
Provisional Liquidators
Provisional Liquidators
Official Receiver
Official Receiver
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) / Hearing for Winding Up Petitions — Order Made
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether substitution of the petitioner is appropriate following assignment of debts
- 2 Whether a winding-up order should be made given unpaid debts and insolvency
- 3 Whether provisional liquidation should continue or the companies should be wound up to permit proofs and distributions
Ratio Decidendi
HSBC had assigned its debts and was no longer a creditor; Standard Chartered was properly substituted as petitioner; the companies were shown to be insolvent with debts unpaid, the provisional liquidators identified no reason to continue provisional liquidation, and therefore the court must wind up the companies to permit adjudication of proofs and distribution of assets, with the petitioner's costs payable out of company assets.
Court Disposition
Winding-up orders made against Moulin Global Eyecare Holdings Limited, Moulin Global Eyecare Trading Limited and Leadkeen Industrial Ltd; Standard Chartered Bank (HK) Ltd substituted as petitioner; provisional liquidation ceased and companies to be wound up.
Orders
- Substitute Standard Chartered Bank (HK) Ltd as petitioner in each petition.
- Make a winding-up order against Moulin Global Eyecare Holdings Limited.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment