Re Datacom Wire & Cable Co. Ltd.
The opposing contributory (Mr Cheung) acted unreasonably in opposing the petition because his opposition lacked any bona fide basis on the sole issue of solvency; therefore the court departed from the ordinary costs rule and ordered specified allocation: original petitioner's advertising and presentation costs and supporting creditors/contributory costs up to 20 October 1999 paid as liquidation expenses, and costs after 20 October 1999 to be paid by the opposing contributory.
- Citation
- Re Datacom Wire & Cable Co. Ltd.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Stella International Ltd; Petitioner: Tay Suh Suh Industrial (HK) Co. Ltd; Opposing Creditor: Sun Ming Wah Holdings Ltd; Opposing Contributory: Mr Cheung Sing Kuen; Supporting Creditor: Luen Hung Fat Industrial Ltd; Supporting Contributory: Mr Chi Shi Jer; Company: Datacom Wire & Cable Company Ltd
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2000
- Case Number
- HCCW717/1999
- Procedural Posture
- Companies Winding Up / Judgment on Costs Following Winding Up Order
- Outcome
- Winding up order made; costs allocated and ordered in favor of petitioners and supporting parties with personal liability for certain costs imposed on opposing contributory
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up, Costs, Opposition by Contributory, Adjournment and Section 182 Application
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stella International Ltd
Petitioner
Tay Suh Suh Industrial (HK) Co. Ltd
Petitioner
Sun Ming Wah Holdings Ltd
Opposing Creditor
Mr Cheung Sing Kuen
Opposing Contributory
Luen Hung Fat Industrial Ltd
Supporting Creditor
Mr Chi Shi Jer
Supporting Contributory
Datacom Wire & Cable Company Ltd
Company
Procedural Posture
Companies Winding Up / Judgment on Costs Following Winding Up Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to depart from the ordinary costs rule in successful winding up petitions
- 2 Whether the opposing contributory acted unreasonably in opposing the petition
- 3 Proper allocation of costs as liquidation expenses versus personal liability of opposing parties
Ratio Decidendi
The opposing contributory (Mr Cheung) acted unreasonably in opposing the petition because his opposition lacked any bona fide basis on the sole issue of solvency; therefore the court departed from the ordinary costs rule and ordered specified allocation: original petitioner's advertising and presentation costs and supporting creditors/contributory costs up to 20 October 1999 paid as liquidation expenses, and costs after 20 October 1999 to be paid by the opposing contributory.
Court Disposition
Winding up order made; costs allocated and ordered in favor of petitioners and supporting parties with personal liability for certain costs imposed on opposing contributory
Orders
- The original petitioner\'s costs of presenting and advertising the petition shall be paid out of the assets of the Company as a liquidation expense.
- The costs of the creditors and contributories supporting the petition up to and including the hearing on 20 October 1999 shall be paid out of the assets of the Company as a liquidation expense.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment