Re Soo & Edmund Co. Ltd.
The company gave no valid explanation for failing to apply to set aside the default judgment obtained after proper service at its registered office; having been afforded an opportunity to apply and having failed to do so, the court refused further indulgence and made a winding-up order for failure to pay the judgment debt.
- Citation
- Re Soo & Edmund Co. Ltd.
- Parties
- Company (respondent): Soo & Edmund Co. Ltd; Official Receiver: Official Receiver
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 3 April 2000
- Case Number
- HCCW35/2000
- Procedural Posture
- Winding Up Petition Under Companies Ordinance / Final Hearing and Order Made
- Outcome
- Winding-up order made
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up, Service of Process, Default Judgment, Setting Aside Judgment, Statutory Demand
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Soo & Edmund Co. Ltd
Company (respondent)
Official Receiver
Official Receiver
Procedural Posture
Winding Up Petition Under Companies Ordinance / Final Hearing and Order Made
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the default judgment should be set aside out of time
- 2 Whether service at the company's registered office was valid
- 3 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to grant further adjournment or relief
Ratio Decidendi
The company gave no valid explanation for failing to apply to set aside the default judgment obtained after proper service at its registered office; having been afforded an opportunity to apply and having failed to do so, the court refused further indulgence and made a winding-up order for failure to pay the judgment debt.
Court Disposition
Winding-up order made
Orders
- Winding-up order made against Soo & Edmund Co. Ltd
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment