RE G & G HONG KONG LTD
The court ordered winding up because a debt evidenced by a Labour Tribunal award remained unpaid after demand and after adjournments and warnings, and the company failed to appear and pay the reduced award, thus meeting the statutory ground for compulsory winding up under the Companies Ordinance.
- Citation
- RE G & G HONG KONG LTD
- Parties
- Petitioner: Cheng Kwok Lam; Company: G & G Hong Kong Limited; Official Receiver: Official Receiver
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2004
- Case Number
- HCCW817/2004
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding Up) / Order for Winding Up
- Outcome
- Company ordered to be wound up by the court
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up, Labour Tribunal Award, Creditor Petition
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cheng Kwok Lam
Petitioner
G & G Hong Kong Limited
Company
Official Receiver
Official Receiver
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) / Order for Winding Up
Legal Issues
- 1 whether a creditor petition based on an unpaid Labour Tribunal award justifies winding up
- 2 whether reduction of the Labour Tribunal award affected entitlement to wind up
- 3 effect of the company's non-appearance and non-payment
Ratio Decidendi
The court ordered winding up because a debt evidenced by a Labour Tribunal award remained unpaid after demand and after adjournments and warnings, and the company failed to appear and pay the reduced award, thus meeting the statutory ground for compulsory winding up under the Companies Ordinance.
Court Disposition
Company ordered to be wound up by the court
Orders
- Order that G & G Hong Kong Limited be wound up
- Petitioner’s costs to be paid out of the Company’s assets
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment