RE MYRIAD GOLD CORPORATION
The petitions were dismissed and provisional liquidators discharged because the court was satisfied there was a bona fide settlement between the shareholders which, together with conditional settlements with major employers and the provisional liquidators' own reports indicating likely solvency or sufficient recoveries, meant creditors' interests would not be prejudiced and dismissal would avoid wasteful costs and multiplicity of proceedings.
- Citation
- RE MYRIAD GOLD CORPORATION
- Parties
- Company (subject of Winding Up Petition): Boldwin Construction Company Limited; Company (subject of Winding Up Petition): Maintain Profits Limited; Company (subject of Winding Up Petition): Myriad Gold Corporation; Company (subject of Winding Up Petition): B F Construction Company Limited; Petitioner: Junestar Investment Corporation; Petitioner/shareholder: Madam Law Wai Duen (Nina); Respondent/shareholder: Dr Chan Siu Chick; Provisional Liquidators: Provisional Liquidators; Official Receiver: Official Receiver
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 8 February 2006
- Case Number
- HCCW346/2002
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding Up) / Judgment (dismissal of Petitions)
- Outcome
- Petitions dismissed and provisional liquidators discharged
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up, Provisional Liquidators, Misfeasance, Just and Equitable Winding Up, Dismissal of Petition, Settlement Between Shareholders
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Boldwin Construction Company Limited
Company (subject of Winding Up Petition)
Maintain Profits Limited
Company (subject of Winding Up Petition)
Myriad Gold Corporation
Company (subject of Winding Up Petition)
B F Construction Company Limited
Company (subject of Winding Up Petition)
Junestar Investment Corporation
Petitioner
Madam Law Wai Duen (Nina)
Petitioner/shareholder
Dr Chan Siu Chick
Respondent/shareholder
Provisional Liquidators
Provisional Liquidators
Official Receiver
Official Receiver
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) / Judgment (dismissal of Petitions)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the winding-up petitions should be dismissed given a confidential settlement between shareholders
- 2 Whether dismissal would prejudice creditors or the public interest where insolvency is alleged
- 3 Whether Dr Chan had locus to apply to dismiss the petition against BF
Ratio Decidendi
The petitions were dismissed and provisional liquidators discharged because the court was satisfied there was a bona fide settlement between the shareholders which, together with conditional settlements with major employers and the provisional liquidators' own reports indicating likely solvency or sufficient recoveries, meant creditors' interests would not be prejudiced and dismissal would avoid wasteful costs and multiplicity of proceedings.
Court Disposition
Petitions dismissed and provisional liquidators discharged
Orders
- The petition against each of the four companies (Boldwin Construction Company Limited; Maintain Profits Limited; Myriad Gold Corporation; B F Construction Company Limited) is dismissed
- The provisional liquidators are discharged from their office in respect of each of the four companies
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment