BEATRICE TSANG SAU HING AND ANOTHER v. YUENG MAN LOONG MAXLY AND OTHERS
The court ordered that the Yeungs pay the Tsangs the costs of the Tsangs' petitions on the party and party basis and pay the costs of the Yeungs' cross-petitions to the Tsangs to be taxed on an indemnity basis; the remuneration and expenses of the provisional liquidators are not to be ordered to be paid personally...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- BEATRICE TSANG SAU HING AND ANOTHER v. YUENG MAN LOONG MAXLY AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Petitioner; 1st Respondent: BEATRICE TSANG SAU HING; 2nd Petitioner; 2nd Respondent: LUANA TSANG SAU KUEN; 1st Respondent; 1st Petitioner: YUENG MAN LOONG MAXLY; 2nd Respondent; 2nd Petitioner: YEUNG MAN FUNG; 3rd Respondent: LO WAI YIN; 4th Respondent: YEUNG TUNG SHING; 3rd Respondent: TSANG HON KONG; 5th Respondent; 4th Respondent: GOLD PLEASURE INDUSTRIAL COMPANY LIMITED; 5th Respondent; 4th Respondent: TOPVILLE INDUSTRIAL COMPANY LIMITED; 5th Respondent; 4th Respondent: SUNVILLE INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED; 5th Respondent; 4th Respondent: BOVILLE INDUSTRIAL COMPANY LIMITED; Provisional Liquidator: DEREK LAI; Provisional Liquidator: DARACH HAUGHEY
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 12 March 2008
- Case Number
- HCCW49/2006
- Procedural Posture
- Companies (winding Up) Petitions Under Companies Ordinance / Costs Hearing (post Judgment)
- Outcome
- Costs orders made post-judgment: mixed result; Yeungs liable for petition and cross-petition costs as specified; provisional liquidators' fees borne by companies; no costs order for the costs hearing.
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up, Just and Equitable Winding Up, Section 177(1)(f), Section 168 a, Taxation of Costs, Indemnity Costs, Provisional Liquidator Remuneration
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BEATRICE TSANG SAU HING
1st Petitioner; 1st Respondent
LUANA TSANG SAU KUEN
2nd Petitioner; 2nd Respondent
YUENG MAN LOONG MAXLY
1st Respondent; 1st Petitioner
YEUNG MAN FUNG
2nd Respondent; 2nd Petitioner
LO WAI YIN
3rd Respondent
YEUNG TUNG SHING
4th Respondent
TSANG HON KONG
3rd Respondent
GOLD PLEASURE INDUSTRIAL COMPANY LIMITED
5th Respondent; 4th Respondent
TOPVILLE INDUSTRIAL COMPANY LIMITED
5th Respondent; 4th Respondent
SUNVILLE INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED
5th Respondent; 4th Respondent
BOVILLE INDUSTRIAL COMPANY LIMITED
5th Respondent; 4th Respondent
DEREK LAI
Provisional Liquidator
DARACH HAUGHEY
Provisional Liquidator
Procedural Posture
Companies (winding Up) Petitions Under Companies Ordinance / Costs Hearing (post Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Incidence of costs between petitioners and respondents
- 2 Appropriate basis of taxation (party and party vs indemnity)
- 3 Whether provisional liquidators' remuneration should be paid personally by respondents or by the companies
Ratio Decidendi
The court ordered that the Yeungs pay the Tsangs the costs of the Tsangs' petitions on the party and party basis and pay the costs of the Yeungs' cross-petitions to the Tsangs to be taxed on an indemnity basis; the remuneration and expenses of the provisional liquidators are not to be ordered to be paid personally by the Yeungs but are to be borne by the companies (i.e. form part of the liquidation costs); no order as to costs was made for the costs hearing itself.
Court Disposition
Costs orders made post-judgment: mixed result; Yeungs liable for petition and cross-petition costs as specified; provisional liquidators' fees borne by companies; no costs order for the costs hearing.
Orders
- The Yeungs to pay the Tsangs the costs of the Tsangs' petitions to be taxed on the party and party basis if not agreed
- The Yeungs to pay the Tsangs the costs of the Yeungs' cross-petitions to be taxed on the indemnity basis in default of agreement
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment