WISDOM GAINING LTD v. WISDOM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL LIMITED AND OTHERS
The Tribunal concluded (1) the Ordinance is not shown to contravene the Basic Law on the material before it; (2) redevelopment of the Lot is justified on the evidence of structural and building surveys; (3) the Tribunal adopts the EUV figures derived from the credible experts (adopting Ms Sat's adjusted unit rates for shops and domestic units) giving a total EUV of HKD 73,330,000 with R1's EUV HKD 23,360,000 (31.856%) and R3's EUV HKD 2,080,000 (2.836%); (4) in assessing whether reasonable steps were taken under s4(2)(b) the Tribunal may consider all offers up to determination including post‑application offers and, on the evidence, the offers made were within the band of fair and...
- Citation
- WISDOM GAINING LTD v. WISDOM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL LIMITED AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Applicant: Wisdom Gaining Limited; 1st Respondent: Wisdom Light Industrial Limited; 2nd Respondent (discontinued): Hou Hin Limited; 3rd Respondent: CW Brothers Nominees Pty Limited
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 3 June 2014
- Case Number
- LDCS23000/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Land (compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Ordinance Application / Judgment (lands Tribunal)
- Outcome
- Compulsory sale order made; Lot ordered sold by public auction for redevelopment; reserve price fixed; sale trustees appointed; costs order nisi (no order as to costs)
- Legal Topics
- Existing Use Value (euv), Redevelopment Value (rdv), Reasonable Steps to Acquire Minority Shares, Basic Law Compliance (arts 6 and 105), Reserve Price and Auction Procedure, Expert Witness Evaluation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wisdom Gaining Limited
Applicant
Wisdom Light Industrial Limited
1st Respondent
Hou Hin Limited
2nd Respondent (discontinued)
CW Brothers Nominees Pty Limited
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land (compulsory Sale for Redevelopment) Ordinance Application / Judgment (lands Tribunal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Ordinance is consistent with the Basic Law (Arts 6 and 105)
- 2 What is the correct existing use value (EUV) of each unit
- 3 Whether redevelopment of the Lot is justified by age/state of repair
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal concluded (1) the Ordinance is not shown to contravene the Basic Law on the material before it; (2) redevelopment of the Lot is justified on the evidence of structural and building surveys; (3) the Tribunal adopts the EUV figures derived from the credible experts (adopting Ms Sat's adjusted unit rates for shops and domestic units) giving a total EUV of HKD 73,330,000 with R1's EUV HKD 23,360,000 (31.856%) and R3's EUV HKD 2,080,000 (2.836%); (4) in assessing whether reasonable steps were taken under s4(2)(b) the Tribunal may consider all offers up to determination including post‑application offers and, on the evidence, the offers made were within the band of fair and...
Court Disposition
Compulsory sale order made; Lot ordered sold by public auction for redevelopment; reserve price fixed; sale trustees appointed; costs order nisi (no order as to costs)
Orders
- Order that all undivided shares in the Lot be sold by public auction for the purposes of redevelopment
- Reserve price for the Lot fixed at HKD 118400000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment