WISE SECURITY LTD v. NIP FUNG SUI AND ANOTHER

WISE SECURITY LTD v. NIP FUNG SUI AND ANOTHER

The statement of claim failed to particularise the confidential information and how it was misused; accordingly the Registrar's refusal to order particulars was set aside and the plaintiff was ordered to provide specified further and better particulars within 14 days.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
WISE SECURITY LTD v. NIP FUNG SUI AND ANOTHER
Parties
Plaintiff: Wise Security Limited; 1st Defendant: Nip Fung Siu; 2nd Defendant: HK-Asian Security Limited
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
9 August 2005
Case Number
HCA1387/2003
Procedural Posture
Civil Misuse of Confidential Information; Procuring Breach of Contract; Unlawful Interference / Appeal From Registrar's Dismissal of Summons for Further and Better Particulars (in Chambers)
Outcome
Appeal allowed; Registrar's order dismissed and set aside; plaintiff ordered to provide specified particulars.
Legal Topics
Misuse of Confidential Information, Procuring Breach of Contract, Unlawful Interference, Particulars of Claim, Pleading Sufficiency
Source Language
en
Confidential Information Contract Law Tort (inducing Breach/unlawful Interference) Civil Procedure (pleadings) Misuse of Confidential Information Procuring Breach of Contract Unlawful Interference Particulars of Claim +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Wise Security Limited

Plaintiff

Nip Fung Siu

1st Defendant

HK-Asian Security Limited

2nd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Misuse of Confidential Information; Procuring Breach of Contract; Unlawful Interference / Appeal From Registrar's Dismissal of Summons for Further and Better Particulars (in Chambers)

  1. 1 Whether the statement of claim sufficiently identified the confidential information alleged to have been misused
  2. 2 Whether particulars should have been ordered where the pleading lacked detail as to misuse
  3. 3 Whether the Registrar's dismissal of the 1st defendant's summons for particulars should be overturned

Ratio Decidendi

The statement of claim failed to particularise the confidential information and how it was misused; accordingly the Registrar's refusal to order particulars was set aside and the plaintiff was ordered to provide specified further and better particulars within 14 days.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; Registrar's order dismissed and set aside; plaintiff ordered to provide specified particulars.

Orders

  • Plaintiff to give answers to the specified requests for further and better particulars annexed to the summons dated 30 March 2005 in respect of requests 1(a),(b),(c), 2(a), 3(b), 4(a),(b), 5(a),(b),(c) and 7 within 14 days from the date of the order.