LAM SIU LEUNG AND ANOTHER v. KOOVER WOOLLEN KNITTING FACTORY LTD. AND OTHERS
The court ruled that acknowledgement of the existence of without prejudice negotiations does not waive privilege over their contents; waiver was limited to the contents of the first offer that the petitioners' witness disclosed (including related correspondence), and did not extend to the second or third offers.
- Citation
- LAM SIU LEUNG AND ANOTHER v. KOOVER WOOLLEN KNITTING FACTORY LTD. AND OTHERS
- Parties
- 1st Petitioner: Lam Siu Leung; 2nd Petitioner: Yuen Poon Hing; 1st Respondent: Koover Woollen Knitting Factory Limited; 2nd Respondent: Hoover Woollen Knitwears Limited; 3rd Respondent: China Woollen Knitwears Limited; 4th Respondent: Yuen Kwing Yeung; 5th Respondent: Yuen Chi Hung
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 8 December 1999
- Case Number
- HCMP6321/1998
- Procedural Posture
- Company Petition Under Section 168 a of the Companies Ordinance (cap.32) / Ruling on Scope of Waiver of Without Prejudice Negotiations at Hearing
- Outcome
- Waiver of without prejudice privilege limited to the contents of the first offer disclosed; contents of subsequent offers remain privileged.
- Legal Topics
- Without Prejudice Privilege, Waiver, Admissibility of Settlement Negotiations, Delay Allegations, Section 168 a Companies Ordinance
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lam Siu Leung
1st Petitioner
Yuen Poon Hing
2nd Petitioner
Koover Woollen Knitting Factory Limited
1st Respondent
Hoover Woollen Knitwears Limited
2nd Respondent
China Woollen Knitwears Limited
3rd Respondent
Yuen Kwing Yeung
4th Respondent
Yuen Chi Hung
5th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Company Petition Under Section 168 a of the Companies Ordinance (cap.32) / Ruling on Scope of Waiver of Without Prejudice Negotiations at Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether acknowledging existence of without prejudice negotiations waives privilege as to their contents
- 2 Whether waiver extends beyond the first disclosed offer to subsequent offers and related correspondence
- 3 Whether evidence of without prejudice negotiations is admissible to answer allegations of delay
Ratio Decidendi
The court ruled that acknowledgement of the existence of without prejudice negotiations does not waive privilege over their contents; waiver was limited to the contents of the first offer that the petitioners' witness disclosed (including related correspondence), and did not extend to the second or third offers.
Court Disposition
Waiver of without prejudice privilege limited to the contents of the first offer disclosed; contents of subsequent offers remain privileged.
Orders
- Privilege waived as to the contents of the first offer (including any correspondence concerning that first offer).
- Privilege not waived as to the contents of the second or third offers; such contents are inadmissible.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment