WO HING ENGINEERING LTD. v. TYCO ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION (HONG KONG) LTD.
Applying the Court of Appeal's formula to the actual figures produced a sum of $6,416,466.40 including interest; the court was satisfied the figures were sufficiently reliable to justify an interim payment but, because of the Court of Appeal's order that the balance shall remain in court until the action is fully determined, the judge could not direct payment out of monies in court and therefore ordered the defendant to make the interim payment (approximately the amount in court, c. $4.6 million representing about 72% of the assessed figure) from other sources on or before 26 July 2002 and made a costs order nisi in the plaintiff's favour.
- Citation
- WO HING ENGINEERING LTD. v. TYCO ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION (HONG KONG) LTD.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Wo Hing Engineering Ltd; Defendant: Tyco Engineering & Construction (Hong Kong) Ltd
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2002
- Case Number
- HCCT40/1999
- Procedural Posture
- Construction and Arbitration Proceedings / Interim Payment Application Following Remittal of Quantum by the Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Interim payment awarded; defendant ordered to pay interim payment by 26 July 2002; payment not ordered from monies in court pending any direction from the Court of Appeal; costs nisi in favour of plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- Interim Payment, Quantum of Damages, Interest, Costs, Use of Monies Paid Into Court, Application to Court of Appeal
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wo Hing Engineering Ltd
Plaintiff
Tyco Engineering & Construction (Hong Kong) Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Construction and Arbitration Proceedings / Interim Payment Application Following Remittal of Quantum by the Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an interim payment should be made pending final assessment of quantum
- 2 How to apply the Court of Appeal formula for damages (3% of contract price plus any shortfall between actual costs and 97% of contract price)
- 3 Whether the interim payment can be paid out of monies paid into court given the Court of Appeal order
Ratio Decidendi
Applying the Court of Appeal's formula to the actual figures produced a sum of $6,416,466.40 including interest; the court was satisfied the figures were sufficiently reliable to justify an interim payment but, because of the Court of Appeal's order that the balance shall remain in court until the action is fully determined, the judge could not direct payment out of monies in court and therefore ordered the defendant to make the interim payment (approximately the amount in court, c. $4.6 million representing about 72% of the assessed figure) from other sources on or before 26 July 2002 and made a costs order nisi in the plaintiff's favour.
Court Disposition
Interim payment awarded; defendant ordered to pay interim payment by 26 July 2002; payment not ordered from monies in court pending any direction from the Court of Appeal; costs nisi in favour of plaintiff.
Orders
- Defendant to pay the interim payment on or before 26 July 2002 (interim sum approximately HKD 4,600,000).
- Costs order nisi in favour of the plaintiff on this application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment