HKSAR v. WONG CHI HO

HKSAR v. WONG CHI HO

The magistrate was entitled to prefer PW1's direct oral evidence, and on the basis of witness credibility, proximity/timing shown by the floor plan and related exhibits, the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant entered and loitered in the ladies toilet causing concern; identity was not in dispute so no identification parade was required; the conviction was therefore safe and the appeal is dismissed.

Citation
HKSAR v. WONG CHI HO
Parties
Appellant: WONG CHI HO; Respondent: HKSAR
Court
Court of First Instance
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
24 May 2005
Case Number
HCMA1193/2004
Procedural Posture
Magistracy Appeal (criminal) / Appeal to High Court (court of First Instance) Appellate Jurisdiction
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld
Legal Topics
Loitering Causing Concern, Identification, Credibility of Witness, Investigative Procedure (capo), Sentence (fine and Probation)
Source Language
EN
Criminal Law Evidence Procedure Loitering Causing Concern Identification Credibility of Witness Investigative Procedure (capo) Sentence (fine and Probation)

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

WONG CHI HO

Appellant

HKSAR

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Magistracy Appeal (criminal) / Appeal to High Court (court of First Instance) Appellate Jurisdiction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was properly identified as the person emerging from the ladies toilet
  2. 2 Whether an identification parade was required
  3. 3 Whether the handling of the CAPO investigation and alleged withheld information prejudiced the defence

Ratio Decidendi

The magistrate was entitled to prefer PW1's direct oral evidence, and on the basis of witness credibility, proximity/timing shown by the floor plan and related exhibits, the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant entered and loitered in the ladies toilet causing concern; identity was not in dispute so no identification parade was required; the conviction was therefore safe and the appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.
  • Conviction for loitering causing concern under Crimes Ordinance s.160(3) upheld.