PRIMNE, CRISTINA LLANDELAR v. WONG KA CHUN
Leave to appeal was refused because the Board made permissible factual findings about the accommodation and alternatives which did not involve an error of law; therefore no question of law alone arose under section 31(1) Cap 453 and the Court had no basis to grant leave.
- Citation
- PRIMNE, CRISTINA LLANDELAR v. WONG KA CHUN
- Parties
- Claimant: PRIMNE, CRISTINA LLANDELAR; Defendant: WONG KA CHUN
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 12 August 2016
- Case Number
- HCME2/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Minor Employment Claims Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Under Section 31(1) Cap 453
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Dismissal, Wages in Lieu of Notice, Leave to Appeal, Accommodation for Domestic Worker
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PRIMNE, CRISTINA LLANDELAR
Claimant
WONG KA CHUN
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Minor Employment Claims Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Under Section 31(1) Cap 453
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the employer's provision of a makeshift balcony room amounted to constructive dismissal
- 2 Whether the Board's findings raised a question of law alone under section 31(1) Cap 453
- 3 Whether the Court should grant leave to appeal from the Board's factual findings
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was refused because the Board made permissible factual findings about the accommodation and alternatives which did not involve an error of law; therefore no question of law alone arose under section 31(1) Cap 453 and the Court had no basis to grant leave.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal refused.
Orders
- Leave to appeal refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment