WONG KAM CHEUNG v. HKSAR
Leave to appeal was refused because three levels of the courts had reviewed the matter and uniformly held the statement of claim disclosed no cause of action, and nothing before the Court of Final Appeal persuaded it to depart from those conclusions.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- WONG KAM CHEUNG v. HKSAR
- Parties
- Applicant: WONG KAM CHEUNG; Respondent: HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
- Court
- Court of Final Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2000
- Case Number
- FAMV13/2000
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal to Court of Final Appeal / Determination on Application for Leave
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Malicious Prosecution, Wrongful Refusal of Legal Aid, Leave to Appeal, Strike Out for Failure to Disclose Cause of Action
- Source Language
- et
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
WONG KAM CHEUNG
Applicant
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal to Court of Final Appeal / Determination on Application for Leave
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal should be granted
- 2 Whether the statement of claim for malicious prosecution and wrongful refusal of legal aid disclosed a cause of action
- 3 Whether the prior appellate decisions preclude further appeal
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was refused because three levels of the courts had reviewed the matter and uniformly held the statement of claim disclosed no cause of action, and nothing before the Court of Final Appeal persuaded it to depart from those conclusions.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
bjbj (Not for Circulation) FAMV No. 13 of 2000 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 13 OF 2000 (CIVIL) (ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM CACV No. 310 OF 1999) _____________________ Between: WONG KAM CHEUNG Applicant - and - HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION Respondent _____________________ Appeal Committee: Justice Litton PJ, Mr Justice Bokhary PJ and Mr Justice Silke NPJ Date of Hearing: 22 June 2000 Date of Determination: 22 June 2000 D E T E R M I N A T I O N Mr Justice Litton PJ : This application for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal arises from a criminal prosecution brought against the applicant in March 1994 when he was charged with two conspiracies to defraud. He was convicted on both charges in the District Court but those convictions were quashed on appeal : In relation to the first charge counsel for the prosecution conceded in the Court of Appeal that he could not seek to uphold that conviction, and in relation to the second charge counsel had little to say. Following his acquittal, the applicant brought an action in the High Court against the government for damages. He was acting in person (as he has done throughout). In essence his alleged causes of action were (1) malicious prosecution and (2) wrongful failure by the Director of Legal Aid to give him legal aid in order to pursue his suit for damages. The statement of claim was struck out by the Master and the action was dismissed, on the ground that no cause of action was shown. This order was upheld by Chung J, whose judgment was in turn upheld by the Court of Appeal. As can be seen, three levels of the judicial hierarchy have reviewed this matter and they all came to the view that the statement of claim disclosed no cause of action. Nothing disclosed in the material before us or said by the applicant persuades us that the matter should go to the Court of Final Appeal. This application is accordingly dismissed. ( Henry Litton ) ( Kemal Bokhary ) ( W J Silke ) Permanent Judge Permanent Judge Non-Permanent Judge Mr Wong Kam Cheung, the Applicant, in person Mr Raymond C W Tam SGC (of Department of Justice) for the Respondent - PAGE - & 6" FAMC No Judge Normal.dot Microsoft Word 8.0 FAMC No Title _PID_GUID }d/ Microsoft Word Document MSWordDoc Word.Document.8