黃衞中 對 陳純妮及另三人
The court refused permission to appeal because the applicant did not show the proposed appeal had a reasonable prospect of success nor any other reason in the interests of justice to warrant a hearing; the court upheld the earlier findings that the applicant failed to serve the defendants within 12 months and that...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] HKCFI 1356
- Parties
- Plaintiff: WONG WAI CHUNG (黃衞中); Defendant: CHAN SHUN NI (陳純妮); Defendant: LEUNG CHUNG CHEONG (梁中昌); Defendant: CHEN KWAN LAP, LAFORCE (陳君立); Defendant: CHEUNG SIU HONG (張紹康); Defendant: 無用人〔第四被告人之化名〕; Defendant: TO KAM TIM (杜金添) alias TIM KAM; Defendant: LUK YAU TONG (陸有棠) alias LUK NGAI (陸毅); Defendant: KWAN KAI HING (關啓興); Defendant: LING TIM KWAI (凌添貴) alias BENNY LING; Defendant: KWONG BING FAI (江炳輝); Defendant: CHEUNG MING HANG (張明行) alias“章銘星”; Defendant: CHEUNG MING TUNG (張明東) alias COUSIN TUNG (東表哥); Defendant: TO MAN CHUNG (杜文聰); Defendant: LAU MAN KWONG (劉文廣); Defendant: LAI TIN SING (賴天成); Defendant: LAM EVE; Defendant: 馮笑萍 (化名“喊萍笑萍”); Defendant: NG WANG YAM (伍宏欽); Defendant: LAU KAM KEUNG (劉金强); Defendant: HO LIK KEI (何力驥); Defendant: HEUNG TO MIDDLE SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION LIMITED (香島中學校友會有限公司) trading under the style or name of HEUNG TO MIDDLE SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION (香島中學校友會)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 2020
- Case Number
- HCA851/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Jurisdiction / Application for Leave to Appeal (written Application)
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused; summons dismissed; earlier orders striking out claims for non‑service and restricting filing upheld; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Permission to Appeal, Striking Out for Failure to Serve, Restriction on Filing Documents, Case Management Orders
- Source Language
- ch
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
WONG WAI CHUNG (黃衞中)
Plaintiff
CHAN SHUN NI (陳純妮)
Defendant
LEUNG CHUNG CHEONG (梁中昌)
Defendant
CHEN KWAN LAP, LAFORCE (陳君立)
Defendant
CHEUNG SIU HONG (張紹康)
Defendant
無用人〔第四被告人之化名〕
Defendant
TO KAM TIM (杜金添) alias TIM KAM
Defendant
LUK YAU TONG (陸有棠) alias LUK NGAI (陸毅)
Defendant
KWAN KAI HING (關啓興)
Defendant
LING TIM KWAI (凌添貴) alias BENNY LING
Defendant
KWONG BING FAI (江炳輝)
Defendant
CHEUNG MING HANG (張明行) alias“章銘星”
Defendant
CHEUNG MING TUNG (張明東) alias COUSIN TUNG (東表哥)
Defendant
TO MAN CHUNG (杜文聰)
Defendant
LAU MAN KWONG (劉文廣)
Defendant
LAI TIN SING (賴天成)
Defendant
LAM EVE
Defendant
馮笑萍 (化名“喊萍笑萍”)
Defendant
NG WANG YAM (伍宏欽)
Defendant
LAU KAM KEUNG (劉金强)
Defendant
HO LIK KEI (何力驥)
Defendant
HEUNG TO MIDDLE SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION LIMITED (香島中學校友會有限公司) trading under the style or name of HEUNG TO MIDDLE SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION (香島中學校友會)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Jurisdiction / Application for Leave to Appeal (written Application)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant demonstrated a reasonable prospect of success on appeal
- 2 Whether claims should be struck out for failure to serve defendants within 12 months of issue
- 3 Whether the applicant should be restricted from filing further documents in court
Ratio Decidendi
The court refused permission to appeal because the applicant did not show the proposed appeal had a reasonable prospect of success nor any other reason in the interests of justice to warrant a hearing; the court upheld the earlier findings that the applicant failed to serve the defendants within 12 months and that restrictions on the applicant filing documents were warranted.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused; summons dismissed; earlier orders striking out claims for non‑service and restricting filing upheld; no order as to costs.
Orders
- Leave to appeal refused
- Summons dated 15 June 2020 dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
HCA 851/2013 [2020] HKCFI 1356 香港特別行政區 高等法院原訟法庭 民事司法管轄權 案件編號2013年第851號 _________________ 原告人 WONG WAI CHUNG (黃衞中) 對 第一被告人 CHAN SHUN NI (陳純妮) 第二被告人 LEUNG CHUNG CHEONG (梁中昌) 第三被告人 CHEN KWAN LAP, LAFORCE (陳君立) 第四被告人 CHEUNG SIU HONG (張紹康) 第五被告人 無用人〔第四被告人之化名〕 第六被告人 TO KAM TIM (杜金添) alias TIM KAM 第七被告人 LUK YAU TONG (陸有棠) alias LUK NGAI (陸毅) 第八被告人 KWAN KAI HING (關啓興) 第九被告人 LING TIM KWAI (凌添貴) alias BENNY LING 第十被告人 KWONG BING FAI (江炳輝) 第十一被告人 CHEUNG MING HANG (張明行) alias“章銘星” 第十二被告人 CHEUNG MING TUNG (張明東) alias COUSIN TUNG (東表哥) 第十三被告人 TO MAN CHUNG (杜文聰) 第十四被告人 LAU MAN KWONG (劉文廣) 第十五被告人 LAI TIN SING (賴天成) 第十六被告人 LAM EVE 第十七被告人 馮笑萍 (化名“喊萍笑萍”) 第十八被告人 NG WANG YAM (伍宏欽) 第十九被告人 LAU KAM KEUNG (劉金强) 第二十被告人 HO LIK KEI (何力驥) 第二十一被告人 HEUNG TO MIDDLE SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION LIMITED (香島中學校友會有限公司) trading under the style or name of HEUNG TO MIDDLE SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION (香島中學校友會) _________________ 主審法官 ：高等法院原訟法庭暫委法官廖文健（書面處理） 判決書日期 ：2020年6月29日 判 決 書 原告人在2020年6月15日發出傳票(“該傳票”)，就著本席在[2020] HKCFI 1077(“該判決書”)所作的判決，申請上訴許可。 本席在2020年6月16日作出指示，原告人的申請，法庭將會以書面處理。本席在作出決定前，已經考慮了原告人就著該傳票提交的文件。 原告人要取得上訴許可，擬提出的上訴必須有合理機會得直，或者有其他有利於秉行公正的理由，因而該上訴應進行聆訊。參見《高等法院條例》第14AA(4); SMSE v KL [2009] 4 HKLRD 125, [17]; Hong Kong Civil Procedure 2020, Volume 1, para. 59/2A/4。 本席在該判決書說了的事情，在此不贅。為簡明起見，本席在此採納該判決書中所用的簡稱。 本席在該判決書作了兩項裁決： 鑑於原告人未能證明他在本案的傳訊令狀發出後的12個月內，把該令狀妥為送達予該等被告人，本席頒令剔除針對該等被告人的申索。 鑑於原告人經常在法院存檔大量不相關的誓詞，本席頒令限制原告人在法院存檔文件。 本席細閱了原告人提交的有關該傳票的文件，原告人在當中表達了他不服和不滿本席的裁決。然而，原告人並沒有指出本席在該判決書中所作的判決，在何處有錯，以致他擬提出的上訴有合理的機會得直。 本席認為，原告人並沒有展示他擬提出的上訴有合理的機會得直。本席同時認為，沒有任何有利於秉行公正的理由，因而該上訴應進行聆訊。原告人的上訴許可申請，是完全沒有理據的。 本席撤銷該傳票，不作訟費命令。 ( 廖文健 ) 高等法院原訟法庭暫委法官 原告人：無律師代表，書面陳詞。