TING KAM YUEN v. VIATECH ENGINEERING LTD AND ANOTHER
On uncontested evidence and contemporaneous admissions and documents (work permits, payroll, tax returns, Forms 2 and correspondence) the court found Viatech Engineering Ltd was the employer of the eight deceased and Zen Pacific Civil Contractors Ltd was the principal contractor; the accident occurred in the course of employment and thus arose out of employment by statutory presumption; compensation was payable under s.6 calculated from stated monthly earnings and apportioned among dependants under Schedule 7; interest and costs ordered; indemnity claim between respondents to be heard subsequently.
- Citation
- TING KAM YUEN v. VIATECH ENGINEERING LTD AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Applicant (acting for Family of TSO PAK Kuen, Deceased): LI YUEN YAU; Applicant (acting for Family of CHAN SHING Tong, Deceased): LEE CHIU LAN; Applicant (lawful Attorney for Multiple Russian Families of Deceased Crew): TING KAM YUEN; 1st Respondent (alleged Employer/sub Contractor): VIATECH ENGINEERING LIMITED; 2nd Respondent (alleged Principal Contractor): ZEN PACIFIC CIVIL CONTRACTORS LIMITED
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2007
- Case Number
- DCEC243/2004
- Procedural Posture
- Employees Compensation (fatal Cases) / Judgment on Liability and Quantum; Indemnity Claim Under S.24(2) Adjourned for Separate Hearing
- Outcome
- Judgment for Applicants: findings of employer status against 1st Respondent and principal contractor status against 2nd Respondent; compensation awarded as assessed below; indemnity claim between respondents adjourned for separate hearing
- Legal Topics
- Workers' Compensation, Employer Status, Principal Contractor Liability, Fatal Accident Compensation, Quantum Calculation Under Statute, Apportionment Among Dependants, Interest on Awards, Costs and Taxation, Indemnity Between Contractors
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LI YUEN YAU
Applicant (acting for Family of TSO PAK Kuen, Deceased)
LEE CHIU LAN
Applicant (acting for Family of CHAN SHING Tong, Deceased)
TING KAM YUEN
Applicant (lawful Attorney for Multiple Russian Families of Deceased Crew)
VIATECH ENGINEERING LIMITED
1st Respondent (alleged Employer/sub Contractor)
ZEN PACIFIC CIVIL CONTRACTORS LIMITED
2nd Respondent (alleged Principal Contractor)
Procedural Posture
Employees Compensation (fatal Cases) / Judgment on Liability and Quantum; Indemnity Claim Under S.24(2) Adjourned for Separate Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether 1st Respondent was the employer of the deceased crew members
- 2 Whether 2nd Respondent was principal contractor liable under s.24 of Cap.282
- 3 Whether the accident arose out of and in the course of employment
Ratio Decidendi
On uncontested evidence and contemporaneous admissions and documents (work permits, payroll, tax returns, Forms 2 and correspondence) the court found Viatech Engineering Ltd was the employer of the eight deceased and Zen Pacific Civil Contractors Ltd was the principal contractor; the accident occurred in the course of employment and thus arose out of employment by statutory presumption; compensation was payable under s.6 calculated from stated monthly earnings and apportioned among dependants under Schedule 7; interest and costs ordered; indemnity claim between respondents to be heard subsequently.
Court Disposition
Judgment for Applicants: findings of employer status against 1st Respondent and principal contractor status against 2nd Respondent; compensation awarded as assessed below; indemnity claim between respondents adjourned for separate hearing
Orders
- Findings: VIATECH ENGINEERING LIMITED is the employer of the eight deceased; ZEN PACIFIC CIVIL CONTRACTORS LIMITED is the principal contractor and liable under s.24 of Cap.282
- Award DCEC 153/2004 (TSO Pak-kuen): HKD 504000 compensation
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment