LAI JIN AND OTHERS v. FOK CHIT AND ANOTHER
Court fixed monthly dependency at $500, applied a multiplier of 6 to award $36,000 general damages under the Fatal Accidents Ordinance, added agreed special damages of $4,550 and assessed $10,000 under Cap.23 (to merge with Cap.22 award); assessed separate general and special damages for the 2nd plaintiff at $7,500 and $715 respectively and for the 3rd plaintiff at $2,000 and $360 respectively; interest and costs awarded to plaintiffs.
- Citation
- LAI JIN AND OTHERS v. FOK CHIT AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: LAI JIN (Administratrix of the Estate of KWONG SI HUNG deceased); 2nd Plaintiff: KWONG KAU; 3rd Plaintiff: LEUNG MEI LING; 1st Defendant: FOK CHIT; 2nd Defendant: TAM TANG FAI
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 3 November 1978
- Case Number
- HCA721/1978
- Procedural Posture
- Tort Road Traffic Accident; Fatal Accidents; Personal Injury / Assessment of Damages and Delivery of Judgment (interlocutory Judgment Entered; Damages to Be Assessed)
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiffs on assessment of damages; damages awarded to plaintiffs; interest and costs awarded; Certificate for Counsel granted.
- Legal Topics
- Wrongful Death, Dependency, Multipliers, Special Damages, Interest, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LAI JIN (Administratrix of the Estate of KWONG SI HUNG deceased)
1st Plaintiff
KWONG KAU
2nd Plaintiff
LEUNG MEI LING
3rd Plaintiff
FOK CHIT
1st Defendant
TAM TANG FAI
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Tort Road Traffic Accident; Fatal Accidents; Personal Injury / Assessment of Damages and Delivery of Judgment (interlocutory Judgment Entered; Damages to Be Assessed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Quantum of dependency for fatal accident claim
- 2 Appropriate multiplier for future dependency
- 3 Assessment of general and special damages for injured plaintiffs
Ratio Decidendi
Court fixed monthly dependency at $500, applied a multiplier of 6 to award $36,000 general damages under the Fatal Accidents Ordinance, added agreed special damages of $4,550 and assessed $10,000 under Cap.23 (to merge with Cap.22 award); assessed separate general and special damages for the 2nd plaintiff at $7,500 and $715 respectively and for the 3rd plaintiff at $2,000 and $360 respectively; interest and costs awarded to plaintiffs.
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiffs on assessment of damages; damages awarded to plaintiffs; interest and costs awarded; Certificate for Counsel granted.
Orders
- Award to estate of deceased (1st Plaintiff): General damages $36,000 under Fatal Accidents Ordinance (Cap.22)
- Agreed special damages to estate: $4,550
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment