CHAN KING WAN AND OTHERS v. HONEST SCAFFOLD GENERAL CONTRACTOR CO LTD AND ANOTHER
Yip Siu Yin is a necessary and proper party because she remains a validly appointed administratrix whose participation is required to prosecute the estate's statutory causes of action and there was no application to revoke her office; practical difficulties faced by the insurer did not justify striking her out under O.15 r.6.
- Citation
- CHAN KING WAN AND OTHERS v. HONEST SCAFFOLD GENERAL CONTRACTOR CO LTD AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff (administratrix of the Estate of Leung Hoi Sung): CHAN KING WAN; 1st Plaintiff (administratrix of the Estate of Leung Hoi Sung): YIP SIU YIN; 2nd Plaintiff (administratrix of the Estate of Leung Kit Chuen): POON CHUNG KAM; 2nd Plaintiff (administratrix of the Estate of Leung Kit Chuen): NG WAI LING; 1st Defendant: HONEST SCAFFOLD GENERAL CONTRACTOR COMPANY LIMITED; 2nd Defendant: KAI TAI CONSTRUCTION AND ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 1998
- Case Number
- HCPI1267/1996
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury (fatal Accident/wrongful Death) / Interlocutory Appeal Against Master's Order Under O.15 R.6 to Strike Out a Party
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; the Master's order striking out Yip Siu Yin set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Wrongful Death, Administration of Estates, Striking Out Parties, Fiduciary Duties, Insurer Subrogation and Cooperation
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CHAN KING WAN
1st Plaintiff (administratrix of the Estate of Leung Hoi Sung)
YIP SIU YIN
1st Plaintiff (administratrix of the Estate of Leung Hoi Sung)
POON CHUNG KAM
2nd Plaintiff (administratrix of the Estate of Leung Kit Chuen)
NG WAI LING
2nd Plaintiff (administratrix of the Estate of Leung Kit Chuen)
HONEST SCAFFOLD GENERAL CONTRACTOR COMPANY LIMITED
1st Defendant
KAI TAI CONSTRUCTION AND ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury (fatal Accident/wrongful Death) / Interlocutory Appeal Against Master's Order Under O.15 R.6 to Strike Out a Party
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Yip Siu Yin is a proper and necessary party as an administratrix
- 2 Whether an administratrix can be struck out where office remains valid and no revocation applied for
- 3 Whether conflict of interest or past fiduciary duties justify removal from proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
Yip Siu Yin is a necessary and proper party because she remains a validly appointed administratrix whose participation is required to prosecute the estate's statutory causes of action and there was no application to revoke her office; practical difficulties faced by the insurer did not justify striking her out under O.15 r.6.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; the Master's order striking out Yip Siu Yin set aside.
Orders
- The appeal is allowed and the order of the Master is set aside.
- The 1st Plaintiffs are to have the costs below and of the appeal in any event.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment