YANG FOO-OI v. WAI WAI CHEN AND ANOTHER
The court found on the facts that the Subject Document fell within Schedule A / the Letter of Request and was relevant evidence of the Family Arrangements such that special circumstances existed to release the implied undertaking to permit Angela, a third party, to use the Subject Document in the California Action; however the court refused leave to use the document in intended contempt proceedings. The release would not occasion injustice to the disclosing party. Costs were apportioned accordingly.
- Citation
- YANG FOO-OI v. WAI WAI CHEN AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff: YANG FOO-OI; 1st Defendant: WAI WAI CHEN; 2nd Defendant: TIMFORD RESOURCES LIMITED; Intended Intervener: ANGELA CHEN aka ANGELA C. SABELLA
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 8 March 2013
- Case Number
- HCA1739/2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (high Court Action No. 1739 of 2010; Related Foreign Proceedings) / Chambers Hearing — Application for Leave to Use a Disclosed Document (judgment on 8 March 2013)
- Outcome
- Leave granted for Angela to use the Subject Document in the California Action; leave refused for use in intended contempt proceedings; costs order against Vivien for half of Angela's costs; order nisi to be made final after 21 days.
- Legal Topics
- Implied Undertaking on Discovery, Release of Discovery to Third Parties, Use of Disclosed Documents in Foreign Proceedings, Letters of Request / Mutual Legal Assistance, Contempt Applications, Special Circumstances Test
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
YANG FOO-OI
Plaintiff
WAI WAI CHEN
1st Defendant
TIMFORD RESOURCES LIMITED
2nd Defendant
ANGELA CHEN aka ANGELA C. SABELLA
Intended Intervener
Procedural Posture
Civil (high Court Action No. 1739 of 2010; Related Foreign Proceedings) / Chambers Hearing — Application for Leave to Use a Disclosed Document (judgment on 8 March 2013)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the implied undertaking not to use documents produced on discovery can be released to a third party
- 2 Whether the Subject Document falls within the scope of the California Letter of Request / Schedule A and thus was producible under the Disclosure Order
- 3 Whether special circumstances exist to permit use of the Subject Document in the California Action
Ratio Decidendi
The court found on the facts that the Subject Document fell within Schedule A / the Letter of Request and was relevant evidence of the Family Arrangements such that special circumstances existed to release the implied undertaking to permit Angela, a third party, to use the Subject Document in the California Action; however the court refused leave to use the document in intended contempt proceedings. The release would not occasion injustice to the disclosing party. Costs were apportioned accordingly.
Court Disposition
Leave granted for Angela to use the Subject Document in the California Action; leave refused for use in intended contempt proceedings; costs order against Vivien for half of Angela's costs; order nisi to be made final after 21 days.
Orders
- Angela to be joined insofar as necessary for the purpose of her application
- Leave granted for Angela to use the Subject Document in the California Action (order in terms of paragraph 1(a) of the summons dated 19 October 2012)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment