KWAN KWAI LIN AND ANOTHER v. YEUNG ON KI
Leave was granted. The judge held that because the Court of Appeal remitted issues to a different judge, fresh evidence could be admitted; the Daughter's statement was short and probative, the Defendant could adequately respond within available time, there was insufficient prejudice or disruption to justify refusal, and the objectives of civil justice reform did not outweigh the need to decide the dispute on substantive merits. Accordingly admission was justified and conditional directions for a supplemental statement and costs were ordered.
- Citation
- [2025] HKCFI 5265
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff (in Personal Capacity): Kwan Kwai Lin; 2nd Plaintiff (administrator of the Estate of Yeung Ho Wai, Deceased): Kwan Kwai Lin; Defendant: Yeung On Ki
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 5 November 2025
- Case Number
- HCA3013/2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (trust/property) / Pre Trial Application for Leave to Adduce Witness Statement Before Re Trial
- Outcome
- Leave granted to the plaintiffs to file and serve the Witness Statement of Kwan Tsz Ching; leave granted to the Defendant to file and serve a supplemental witness statement by 1 December 2025; costs of the application to be in the cause of the re-trial; plaintiffs' own costs to be taxed in accordance with Legal Aid...
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Trust, Resulting Trust, Late Evidence, Leave to Adduce Witness Evidence, Retrial
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kwan Kwai Lin
1st Plaintiff (in Personal Capacity)
Kwan Kwai Lin
2nd Plaintiff (administrator of the Estate of Yeung Ho Wai, Deceased)
Yeung On Ki
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (trust/property) / Pre Trial Application for Leave to Adduce Witness Statement Before Re Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to adduce a new witness statement at the re-trial
- 2 Whether the late introduction of the witness statement would cause unfair prejudice or disruption to the Defendant
- 3 Whether the Court of Appeal's remittal to a different judge permits admission of fresh evidence
Ratio Decidendi
Leave was granted. The judge held that because the Court of Appeal remitted issues to a different judge, fresh evidence could be admitted; the Daughter's statement was short and probative, the Defendant could adequately respond within available time, there was insufficient prejudice or disruption to justify refusal, and the objectives of civil justice reform did not outweigh the need to decide the dispute on substantive merits. Accordingly admission was justified and conditional directions for a supplemental statement and costs were ordered.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to the plaintiffs to file and serve the Witness Statement of Kwan Tsz Ching; leave granted to the Defendant to file and serve a supplemental witness statement by 1 December 2025; costs of the application to be in the cause of the re-trial; plaintiffs' own costs to be taxed in accordance with Legal Aid...
Orders
- Grant leave to the plaintiffs to file and serve the Witness Statement of Kwan Tsz Ching as per the draft attached to the Summons
- Grant leave to the Defendant to file and serve a supplemental witness statement by 1 December 2025
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment