YICK HOK WING v. CHAN YOOK MING and Others
The court held the 31 January 1990 Declaration of Trust created an equitable and enforceable interest in 5,000 shares in favour of the Plaintiff; the 17 July 1995 meeting and resolutions were invalid because the unreasonably short notice was a deliberate pre-emptive act to exclude the Plaintiff and change control and bank mandate; the 18 July 1995 meeting was properly convened and its resolutions are binding; the Belgian Bank acted properly in relying on the signed minutes under s119 and is not liable.
- Citation
- YICK HOK WING v. CHAN YOOK MING and Others
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Yick Hok Wing; 1st Defendant: Chan Yook Ming; 2nd Defendant: Wong Yuk Ying (Elsa); 3rd Defendant: Fung Ping Kit (Steve); 4th Defendant: Fung Man Sang; 5th Defendant: Belgian Bank Limited; 6th Defendant: Au Trou Normand Limited
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 3 December 1996
- Case Number
- HCA7200/1995
- Procedural Posture
- Company/shareholder Dispute (civil) / Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Declarations made for Plaintiff against 1st Defendant as to trust and against resolutions of 17 July; claim against Belgian Bank dismissed; resolutions of 18 July upheld; consequential orders made
- Legal Topics
- Declaration of Trust, Validity of Directors' Meetings, Board Voting Control, Bank Mandate and Reliance on Minutes, Court Injunctions, Company Registry Entries
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yick Hok Wing
Plaintiff
Chan Yook Ming
1st Defendant
Wong Yuk Ying (Elsa)
2nd Defendant
Fung Ping Kit (Steve)
3rd Defendant
Fung Man Sang
4th Defendant
Belgian Bank Limited
5th Defendant
Au Trou Normand Limited
6th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Company/shareholder Dispute (civil) / Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1st Defendant held 5,000 shares on trust for the Plaintiff
- 2 Whether the directors' meeting of 17 July 1995 was valid
- 3 Whether the resolutions passed at the meeting of 18 July 1995 were valid and binding
Ratio Decidendi
The court held the 31 January 1990 Declaration of Trust created an equitable and enforceable interest in 5,000 shares in favour of the Plaintiff; the 17 July 1995 meeting and resolutions were invalid because the unreasonably short notice was a deliberate pre-emptive act to exclude the Plaintiff and change control and bank mandate; the 18 July 1995 meeting was properly convened and its resolutions are binding; the Belgian Bank acted properly in relying on the signed minutes under s119 and is not liable.
Court Disposition
Declarations made for Plaintiff against 1st Defendant as to trust and against resolutions of 17 July; claim against Belgian Bank dismissed; resolutions of 18 July upheld; consequential orders made
Orders
- Declaration: 1st Defendant holds 5,000 shares of Au Trou Normand Limited on trust for the Plaintiff.
- Declaration: Resolutions and acts purportedly done pursuant to the Directors' Meeting of 17 July 1995 are null and void and of no legal effect.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment