YIP YUEN NEUNG SHIRLEY v. LEE SZE WAI t/a 蝦碌美食

YIP YUEN NEUNG SHIRLEY v. LEE SZE WAI t/a 蝦碌美食

The defendant, as a restauranteur who directed a customer to use the backyard toilet, owed a duty of care; the manhole cover posed a foreseeable danger which the defendant failed to alleviate by reasonable steps, rendering her liable in negligence; the occupier's liability claim failed on the pleaded basis and potential ownership issues; the plaintiff was not contributorily negligent; damages awarded accordingly.

Citation
YIP YUEN NEUNG SHIRLEY v. LEE SZE WAI t/a 蝦碌美食
Parties
Plaintiff: Yip; Defendant: Lee
Court
District Court
Jurisdiction
Hong Kong
Judgment Date
21 August 2009
Case Number
DCPI2012/2008
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Negligence / Judgment (district Court)
Outcome
Judgment for Plaintiff against Defendant (Lee) in negligence; occupier's liability claim dismissed.
Legal Topics
Occupier's Liability, Duty of Care, Contributory Negligence, Foreseeability, Standard of Care, Quantum of Damages, Special Damages, Interest on Damages
Source Language
EN

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Yip

Plaintiff

Lee

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury Negligence / Judgment (district Court)

  1. 1 how the accident happened
  2. 2 whether Lee was liable as occupier
  3. 3 whether Lee was liable in negligence

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant, as a restauranteur who directed a customer to use the backyard toilet, owed a duty of care; the manhole cover posed a foreseeable danger which the defendant failed to alleviate by reasonable steps, rendering her liable in negligence; the occupier's liability claim failed on the pleaded basis and potential ownership issues; the plaintiff was not contributorily negligent; damages awarded accordingly.

Court Disposition

Judgment for Plaintiff against Defendant (Lee) in negligence; occupier's liability claim dismissed.

Orders

  • Judgment entered against Lee for HK$218,010 together with interest as specified in judgment.
  • Interest: general damages (PSLA) at 2% per annum from date of writ and interest on miscellaneous special damages at half judgment rate from date of accident; interest from judgment date shall run at the judgment rate until payment.