YIP WAN CHUN v. JIM HON TAK AND OTHERS
The court found the 1st defendant negligent for reversing an excessive distance without taking proper precautions, held on the balance of probabilities that the plaintiff's deafness was caused by the accident, apportioned liability 80% to the 1st defendant (and 3rd defendant employer) and 20% to the plaintiff, and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- YIP WAN CHUN v. JIM HON TAK AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Yip Wan Chun; 1st Defendant: Jim Hon Tak; 2nd Defendant: Mak Wai Kwan; 3rd Defendant: Tak Ring Company (a firm)
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 1985
- Case Number
- HCA11640/1982
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Road Traffic Accident (negligence) / Judgment (high Court)
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Plaintiff against the 1st and 3rd Defendants; claim against the 2nd Defendant dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Apportionment, Causation, Quantum of Damages
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yip Wan Chun
Plaintiff
Jim Hon Tak
1st Defendant
Mak Wai Kwan
2nd Defendant
Tak Ring Company (a firm)
3rd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Road Traffic Accident (negligence) / Judgment (high Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the driver was negligent in reversing the lorry and breaching duty of care
- 2 Whether the plaintiff's deafness and other injuries were caused by the accident
- 3 Apportionment of liability between plaintiff and defendant
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the 1st defendant negligent for reversing an excessive distance without taking proper precautions, held on the balance of probabilities that the plaintiff's deafness was caused by the accident, apportioned liability 80% to the 1st defendant (and 3rd defendant employer) and 20% to the plaintiff, and awarded damages totaling HKD 242,895 with interest and costs.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Plaintiff against the 1st and 3rd Defendants; claim against the 2nd Defendant dismissed.
Orders
- Judgment for the Plaintiff against the 1st and 3rd Defendants in the sum of HKD 242,895.00 together with costs
- Liability apportioned 80% to the 1st Defendant/3rd Defendant and 20% to the Plaintiff
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment