YU HON WAH ALEXIS t/a PERMANENT ENGINEERING CO v. Y M INTERNATIONAL REALTY LTD AND OTHERS
The default judgment against the 4th defendant was set aside because it was irregular: the pleaded cause (breach of warranty of authority) sought unliquidated damages but a final liquidated judgment was entered in breach of Order 19 rules, and independently the earlier default judgment entered against the corporate...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- YU HON WAH ALEXIS t/a PERMANENT ENGINEERING CO v. Y M INTERNATIONAL REALTY LTD AND OTHERS
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Yu Hon Wah Alexis trading as Permanent Engineering Company; 1st Defendant: Y M International Realty Limited; 2nd Defendant: Umidori Restaurant Group Limited; 3rd Defendant: Aegean Business Center Limited; 4th Defendant: Wong Wyman
- Court
- District Court
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 2016
- Case Number
- DCCJ2371/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action for Recovery of Monies and Breach of Warranty of Authority / Appeal From Master on Application to Set Aside Default Judgment (setting Aside Appeal)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; default judgment entered against 4th defendant set aside
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Warranty of Authority, Election Between Alternative Claims, Setting Aside Judgment, Assessment of Damages, Director Liability
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yu Hon Wah Alexis trading as Permanent Engineering Company
Plaintiff
Y M International Realty Limited
1st Defendant
Umidori Restaurant Group Limited
2nd Defendant
Aegean Business Center Limited
3rd Defendant
Wong Wyman
4th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Action for Recovery of Monies and Breach of Warranty of Authority / Appeal From Master on Application to Set Aside Default Judgment (setting Aside Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 4th defendant was personally liable or acting for a corporate defendant
- 2 Whether default judgment against the 4th defendant was irregular because claim against him sought unliquidated damages but a final liquidated judgment was entered
- 3 Whether the plaintiff's earlier default judgment against corporate defendants amounted to an election barring pursuit of alternative inconsistent claims against the 4th defendant
Ratio Decidendi
The default judgment against the 4th defendant was set aside because it was irregular: the pleaded cause (breach of warranty of authority) sought unliquidated damages but a final liquidated judgment was entered in breach of Order 19 rules, and independently the earlier default judgment entered against the corporate defendants constituted a conclusive election by the plaintiff to pursue the corporations to the exclusion of the 4th defendant, thereby barring the plaintiff's alternative inconsistent claim against him.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; default judgment entered against 4th defendant set aside
Orders
- Default judgment entered against the 4th defendant Wong Wyman on 21 November 2014 is set aside
- Order nisi that the 4th defendant's costs of the appeal and of the setting aside application be borne by the plaintiff, to be taxed if not agreed, with certificate for counsel
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment