YU KI v. CHIN KIT IAM AND ANOTHER
The court preferred the plaintiff's account and found the first defendant wholly at fault for driving too fast and not keeping a proper lookout in the prevailing lighting conditions; plaintiff awarded agreed general damages and assessed special damages, allowed bone-setter fees and a limited sum for nourishing food, and awarded interest and costs as specified.
- Citation
- YU KI v. CHIN KIT IAM AND ANOTHER
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Yu Ki; 1st Defendant: CHIN Kit Lam; 2nd Defendant: CHAN Kwai Ming
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 1981
- Case Number
- HCA2224/1980
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiff; first defendant held wholly liable; damages awarded.
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Assessment of General and Special Damages, Nourishing Food Claims, Chinese Medical Treatment Reimbursement, Interest on Damages, Costs
- Source Language
- EN
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yu Ki
Plaintiff
CHIN Kit Lam
1st Defendant
CHAN Kwai Ming
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Liability for pedestrian injury caused by motor vehicle
- 2 Whether plaintiff was contributorily negligent
- 3 Recoverability of nourishing food expenses
Ratio Decidendi
The court preferred the plaintiff's account and found the first defendant wholly at fault for driving too fast and not keeping a proper lookout in the prevailing lighting conditions; plaintiff awarded agreed general damages and assessed special damages, allowed bone-setter fees and a limited sum for nourishing food, and awarded interest and costs as specified.
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiff; first defendant held wholly liable; damages awarded.
Orders
- Special damages awarded $17,582 with interest at 7% from 16 May 1979 to 13 May 1981
- General damages awarded $49,000 with interest at 14% from 13 May 1980 to 13 May 1981
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment