STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH versus LAXMISHANKAR MISHRA AND ORS. ETC.

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH versus LAXMISHANKAR MISHRA AND ORS. ETC.

Computing the period of 7 years under Rule 3(b) is based on performance of duties and discharge of functions as Head Master/Principal irrespective of the capacity (confirmed, incharge, or officiating); the experience gained while working on the post is emphasized by the language of the rule.

Parties
Petitioner: State of Madhya Pradesh; Respondents: Laxmishankar Mishra and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
29 March 1979
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) / Dismissal of SLP After High Court Decision
Outcome
Special Leave Petitions dismissed
Legal Topics
Absorption in Government Service, Interpretation of Service Rules for Teachers, Seniority and Experience Calculation for Head Master/principal Posts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

State of Madhya Pradesh

Petitioner

Laxmishankar Mishra and Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Special Leave Petition (civil) / Dismissal of SLP After High Court Decision

  1. 1 Interpretation of Rule 3(b) of the Madhya Pradesh Local Authorities School Teachers (Absorption in Government Service) Rules, 1963; specifically the meaning of 'should have worked on the post for a minimum period of 7 years'

Ratio Decidendi

Computing the period of 7 years under Rule 3(b) is based on performance of duties and discharge of functions as Head Master/Principal irrespective of the capacity (confirmed, incharge, or officiating); the experience gained while working on the post is emphasized by the language of the rule.

Court Disposition

Special Leave Petitions dismissed

Orders

  • State must account service as incharge or officiating Head Master/Principal towards the 7 years required for absorption.
  • No differentiation should be made between confirmed holders and incharge/officiating holders for eligibility under Rule 3(b).