DATTARAJ NATHUJI THAWARE versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

DATTARAJ NATHUJI THAWARE versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Petitions styled as Public Interest Litigation that are motivated by private interest, blackmail, or for personal gain, and lacking genuine public interest must be dismissed with exemplary costs and prevented from clogging courts and wasting judicial time.

Parties
Petitioner: Dattaraj Nathuji Thaware; Respondents: State of Maharashtra and Ors.; Affected Respondent: Respondent No. 6; Affected Respondent: Respondent No. 7
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
14 December 2004
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) / Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Appeal From Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, W.p. No. 648 of 2004
Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Abuse of PIL, Exemplary Costs, Role of Judiciary in PIL, Regulation of Legal Profession
Public Interest Litigation Legal Profession Regulation Abuse of PIL Exemplary Costs Role of Judiciary in PIL Regulation of Legal Profession

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dattaraj Nathuji Thaware

Petitioner

State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Respondents

Respondent No. 6

Affected Respondent

Respondent No. 7

Affected Respondent

Procedural Posture

Special Leave Petition (civil) / Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Appeal From Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, W.p. No. 648 of 2004

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the PIL filed involved genuine public interest or was motivated by private gain
  2. 2 Scope of abuse and regulation of Public Interest Litigation by professionals
  3. 3 Criteria for entertaining PILs

Ratio Decidendi

Petitions styled as Public Interest Litigation that are motivated by private interest, blackmail, or for personal gain, and lacking genuine public interest must be dismissed with exemplary costs and prevented from clogging courts and wasting judicial time.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Petition dismissed.
  • No further exemplary cost imposed.