NATH SINGH AND OTHERS versus THE BOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS
Where the record of rights for 1356 F has not been corrected, courts are bound by the entry in the record of rights for conferring Adhivasi rights under s. 20 of the Act, and no further inquiry is required as to when respondents became sub-tenants or actual occupants.
- Parties
- Appellants: Nath Singh and Others; Respondents: The Board of Revenue and Others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 21 March 1968
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeals / Supreme Court Appeal by Special Leave Against Judgment of Allahabad High Court in Writ Petitions
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Adhivasi Rights, Interpretation of U.p. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, Status of Sub Tenants and Occupants, Finality of Board of Revenue Orders, Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nath Singh and Others
Appellants
The Board of Revenue and Others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeals / Supreme Court Appeal by Special Leave Against Judgment of Allahabad High Court in Writ Petitions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether entries in the record of rights (Khasra/Khatauni) for 1356 F are conclusive for conferring Adhivasi rights under s. 20(b)(i) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1952, despite prior judicial findings disputing sub-tenancy.
- 2 Whether the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 can be invoked to challenge the finality of the Board of Revenue’s interpretation of s. 20(b).
Ratio Decidendi
Where the record of rights for 1356 F has not been corrected, courts are bound by the entry in the record of rights for conferring Adhivasi rights under s. 20 of the Act, and no further inquiry is required as to when respondents became sub-tenants or actual occupants.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- Appeals fail and are dismissed with costs.
- One hearing fee awarded.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment