SHARAFA THUSSAIN ABDULRAHAMAN SHAIKH AND ORS. versus STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR.
In the absence of the mandatory certificate by the recording police officer regarding the voluntariness of the confession under Rule 15(3)(b) of the TADA Rules, and in the absence of oral testimony to that effect, the confessions cannot be used as evidence against the accused. Without such evidence, the convictions cannot be sustained.
- Parties
- Appellants: Sharafa Thussain Abdulrahaman Shaikh and Ors.; Respondents: State of Gujarat and Anr.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction From Designated Court, Ahmedabad
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Admissibility of Confession, TADA Procedure, Judicial Certification of Voluntariness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sharafa Thussain Abdulrahaman Shaikh and Ors.
Appellants
State of Gujarat and Anr.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction From Designated Court, Ahmedabad
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether confessions recorded under Section 15 of TADA without the mandatory certificate of voluntariness can be used to convict the accused
Ratio Decidendi
In the absence of the mandatory certificate by the recording police officer regarding the voluntariness of the confession under Rule 15(3)(b) of the TADA Rules, and in the absence of oral testimony to that effect, the confessions cannot be used as evidence against the accused. Without such evidence, the convictions cannot be sustained.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Convictions and sentences of the appellants are set aside.
- Appellants to be released forthwith unless wanted in connection with some other case.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment