SURENDRA KUMAR versus STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
Nomination to reserved seats in medical colleges by the Chief Minister of Bihar, in disregard of merit and with no defined criteria, is abuse of power and violative of constitutional equality. Selection must be strictly on the basis of merit, and lists prepared must include all eligible candidates, not only those who applied for specific seats.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Surendra Kumar; Respondents: State of Bihar & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 09 November 1984
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition / Original Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Petition allowed
- Legal Topics
- Admission to Medical Colleges, Executive Power Abuse, Merit Based Selection, Equality Before Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Surendra Kumar
Petitioner
State of Bihar & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition / Original Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether nomination of candidates to reserved seats in medical colleges by the Chief Minister, bypassing merit, is valid under the Constitution.
- 2 Whether failure to follow a merit-based procedure violates Articles 14, 15, and 32.
Ratio Decidendi
Nomination to reserved seats in medical colleges by the Chief Minister of Bihar, in disregard of merit and with no defined criteria, is abuse of power and violative of constitutional equality. Selection must be strictly on the basis of merit, and lists prepared must include all eligible candidates, not only those who applied for specific seats.
Court Disposition
Petition allowed
Orders
- The list of names recommended by the Chief Minister is quashed.
- The Government of Bihar shall forthwith prepare a list according to merit and offer successively to eligible candidates opportunity for admission to medical colleges of Jammu and Kashmir.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment