SADHU SINGH (DECEASED) & ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Permanent proprietary allotment under the statutory scheme confers enforceable rights. Such allotments cannot be cancelled or reallotted to others without following due procedure and providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the original allottee. The impugned orders allocating previously allotted land to others without such procedure are illegal and unsustainable.
- Parties
- Appellants: Sadhu Singh (Deceased) & Ors.; Respondents: Union of India & Ors.; Advocate for Respondent No. 1: K. L. Narula; Advocate for Respondent No. 14: E. C. Agarwala
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 02 September 1978
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order Dated 25 9 67 of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Civil Writ No. 1630/62
- Outcome
- Appeal disposed of with modification
- Legal Topics
- Allotment Cancellation, Displaced Persons Rehabilitation, Right to Hearing, Jurisdiction of Managing Officer, Compensation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sadhu Singh (Deceased) & Ors.
Appellants
Union of India & Ors.
Respondents
K. L. Narula
Advocate for Respondent No. 1
E. C. Agarwala
Advocate for Respondent No. 14
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order Dated 25 9 67 of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Civil Writ No. 1630/62
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent acquired an enforceable right as a result of the allotment made in his favour and delivery of possession.
- 2 Whether parcels of land already allotted to the respondent could be allotted to others without notice and opportunity to be heard.
Ratio Decidendi
Permanent proprietary allotment under the statutory scheme confers enforceable rights. Such allotments cannot be cancelled or reallotted to others without following due procedure and providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the original allottee. The impugned orders allocating previously allotted land to others without such procedure are illegal and unsustainable.
Court Disposition
Appeal disposed of with modification
Orders
- Rectangle No. 134 (kila Nos. 8min, 9min, 10min, 11, 12, 13min, 18min, 19min, 20, 21min, 22min) to be retained by appellants; Rectangle No. 133 (kila Nos. 4min, 5min, 6min, 7min, 14min, 15, 16, 17min, 24, 25) to be given to respondent.
- Respondent at liberty to approach settlement authorities for suitable alternate land if entitled.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment