LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA versus SANJEEV BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA versus SANJEEV BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.

The High Court correctly allowed the amendment under Order VI Rule 17 CPC; Order II Rule 2 CPC applies only to subsequent suits and not to amendments in an existing suit; amendments that are necessary to determine the real controversy and do not cause uncorrectable prejudice should be permitted; the provisos to s.21(5) and s.22(2) of the Specific Relief Act support allowing amendments to claim compensation or other reliefs at any stage, and the impugned High Court order permitting enhancement of the alternative claim for damages is affirmed.

Parties
Appellant / Original Defendant: Life Insurance Corporation of India; Respondents / Original Plaintiffs: Sanjeev Builders Private Limited & Anr.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
01 September 2022
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Decision on Appeal From High Court Order Allowing Amendment of Plaint
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Amendment of Pleadings, Order II Rule 2 CPC, Order VI Rule 17 CPC, Limitation, Constructive Res Judicata, Specific Performance, Section 21(5) Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 22(2) Specific Relief Act

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 25 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Life Insurance Corporation of India

Appellant / Original Defendant

Sanjeev Builders Private Limited & Anr.

Respondents / Original Plaintiffs

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Decision on Appeal From High Court Order Allowing Amendment of Plaint

  1. 1 Whether the High Court committed jurisdictional error in allowing amendment of the plaint
  2. 2 Whether Order II Rule 2 CPC applies to an amendment application
  3. 3 Whether the amendment enhancing damages is hit by constructive res judicata

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court correctly allowed the amendment under Order VI Rule 17 CPC; Order II Rule 2 CPC applies only to subsequent suits and not to amendments in an existing suit; amendments that are necessary to determine the real controversy and do not cause uncorrectable prejudice should be permitted; the provisos to s.21(5) and s.22(2) of the Specific Relief Act support allowing amendments to claim compensation or other reliefs at any stage, and the impugned High Court order permitting enhancement of the alternative claim for damages is affirmed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Impugned order of the High Court dated 13.12.2018 affirmed
  • Appeal dismissed with no order as to costs