SRI BABU RAM @ DURGA PRASAD versus SRI INDRA PAL SINGH (DEAD) BY LRS.

SRI BABU RAM @ DURGA PRASAD versus SRI INDRA PAL SINGH (DEAD) BY LRS.

Annulment of insolvency restores property and rights of insolvent with retrospective effect from date of filing petition, validating plaintiff's acts; time is of essence for re-conveyance; suit filed within limitation as limitation began from date of refusal; High Court exceeded jurisdiction under Section 100 CPC by deciding issues not pressed at trial; novation arguments cannot be accepted in second appeal for the first time.

Parties
Appellant / Plaintiff: Sri Babu Ram @ Durga Prasad; Respondent / Defendant: Sri Indra Pal Singh (dead) by LRs
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
13 August 1998
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Second Appeal Judgment of Allahabad High Court
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Annulment of Insolvency, Effect of Annulment, Re Conveyance of Immovable Property, Novation, Jurisdiction in Second Appeal, Limitation for Specific Performance
Insolvency Law Contract Law Civil Procedure Limitation Law Annulment of Insolvency Effect of Annulment Re Conveyance of Immovable Property Novation +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sri Babu Ram @ Durga Prasad

Appellant / Plaintiff

Sri Indra Pal Singh (dead) by LRs

Respondent / Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Second Appeal Judgment of Allahabad High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the annulment of insolvency restores property and rights with retrospective effect
  2. 2 Whether time is of essence for re-conveyance agreements
  3. 3 Whether novation arguments can be raised for first time in second appeal

Ratio Decidendi

Annulment of insolvency restores property and rights of insolvent with retrospective effect from date of filing petition, validating plaintiff's acts; time is of essence for re-conveyance; suit filed within limitation as limitation began from date of refusal; High Court exceeded jurisdiction under Section 100 CPC by deciding issues not pressed at trial; novation arguments cannot be accepted in second appeal for the first time.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Judgment and decree of High Court set aside
  • Judgment and decree of trial court as affirmed by first appellate court restored