SIDDIQUE versus STATE OF KERALA & ANR.
The Supreme Court allowed anticipatory bail because the complainant lodged the complaint about eight years after the alleged incident (2016), had made allegations in a 2018 Facebook post against about 14 persons including the appellant, and had not gone to the Justice Hema Committee; accordingly bail was granted subject to conditions including deposit of passport and cooperation with the Investigating Officer.
- Parties
- Appellant/accused: Siddique; Respondents: State of Kerala & Anr.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal to Supreme Court Against High Court Order Rejecting Anticipatory Bail; Leave Granted by Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Anticipatory Bail, Delay in Lodging Complaint, Social Media Post as Evidence, Conditions of Bail, Sensitivity of the Case
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Siddique
Appellant/accused
State of Kerala & Anr.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal to Supreme Court Against High Court Order Rejecting Anticipatory Bail; Leave Granted by Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appellant is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
- 2 Relevance of delay in lodging the complaint to grant of anticipatory bail
- 3 Effect of a Facebook post and failure to approach the Justice Hema Committee on the case
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court allowed anticipatory bail because the complainant lodged the complaint about eight years after the alleged incident (2016), had made allegations in a 2018 Facebook post against about 14 persons including the appellant, and had not gone to the Justice Hema Committee; accordingly bail was granted subject to conditions including deposit of passport and cooperation with the Investigating Officer.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Appellant to be released on bail if arrested in connection with F.I.R. Crime No.1192 of 2024 dated 27.08.2024 registered at Police Station Museum, Thiruvananthapuram City, subject to the conditions that may be imposed by the Trial Court.
- Condition that the appellant shall deposit his passport before the Trial Court and shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer in carrying out the investigation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment