ADOR SAMIA PRIVATE LIMITED versus PEEKA Y HOLDING LIMITED AND ORS.
An order passed by the Chief Justice or his designate under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, being administrative in nature, cannot be challenged directly before the Supreme Court under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Ador Samia Private Limited; Respondents: Peeka Y Holding Limited and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 20 August 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Special Leave Petition (civil) / Disposition by Supreme Court on Maintainability
- Outcome
- Petition disposed of as not maintainable.
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Arbitrator, Jurisdiction Under Article 136, Administrative Vs Judicial Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ador Samia Private Limited
Petitioner
Peeka Y Holding Limited and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) / Disposition by Supreme Court on Maintainability
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an order by the Chief Justice or his designate under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 can be challenged by way of Special Leave Petition under Article 136 of the Constitution of India
Ratio Decidendi
An order passed by the Chief Justice or his designate under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, being administrative in nature, cannot be challenged directly before the Supreme Court under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.
Court Disposition
Petition disposed of as not maintainable.
Orders
- Petition disposed of as not maintainable under Article 136.
- No opinion expressed on the merits of the controversy.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment