ASHOK KUMAR AND ORS. versus RISHI RAM AND ORS.
The 'first hearing' in Section 20(4) Explanation (a) is the date fixed by the court after opportunity to file written statement and when the court proposes to apply its mind to identify controversy; deposit of arrears on that date entitles tenant to statutory relief from eviction under Section 20(4).
- Parties
- Appellants/tenants: Ashok Kumar and Ors.; Respondents/landlords: Rishi Ram and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 08 July 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Appeal From Allahabad High Court Judgment in CMWP No. 10594 of 1985
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; suit of landlords dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Arrears of Rent, Eviction, First Hearing Definition, Benefit of Deposit Under Section 20(4)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ashok Kumar and Ors.
Appellants/tenants
Rishi Ram and Ors.
Respondents/landlords
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Appeal From Allahabad High Court Judgment in CMWP No. 10594 of 1985
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether arrears of rent paid at first hearing within meaning of Section 20(4) of U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972
- 2 Interpretation of 'first hearing' in Section 20(4) Explanation (a)
Ratio Decidendi
The 'first hearing' in Section 20(4) Explanation (a) is the date fixed by the court after opportunity to file written statement and when the court proposes to apply its mind to identify controversy; deposit of arrears on that date entitles tenant to statutory relief from eviction under Section 20(4).
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; suit of landlords dismissed.
Orders
- Order of High Court and IV Additional District Judge set aside.
- Suit for eviction and arrears dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment