BALASAHEB KESHAWRAO BHAPKAR & ORS. versus SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA & ORS.
In view of exceptional and peculiar circumstances (long incarceration of petitioners, prolonged non-refund to investors, SEBI's practical difficulties in timebound country-wide auctions and uncertainty of criminal trials), the Court invoked Article 142 to constitute a High-Powered Sale Committee chaired by a former Supreme Court judge with specified membership, powers (including all powers of a Civil Court), duties and procedures to identify, secure, value and auction the companies' immovable assets, to deposit sale proceeds in a dedicated account and effect refunds to investors; the Court also prescribed procedures for valuation, e-auction, record custody, state cooperation, remuneration...
- Parties
- Petitioners: Balasaheb Keshawrao Bhapkar & Ors.; Respondents: Securities and Exchange Board of India & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition (criminal) No. 546 of 2023 Under Article 32 / Order Disposing Petition (directions Issued)
- Outcome
- Writ petition disposed by issuing directions under Article 142; HPSC constituted and measures prescribed to auction assets and refund investors; interim bail granted to Petitioners Nos.1 and 2
- Legal Topics
- Article 142 Relief, High Powered Sale Committee, Auction of Assets, Investor Refund Procedure, Interim Bail
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Balasaheb Keshawrao Bhapkar & Ors.
Petitioners
Securities and Exchange Board of India & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (criminal) No. 546 of 2023 Under Article 32 / Order Disposing Petition (directions Issued)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Article 142 could be invoked to constitute a High-Powered Sale Committee to auction immovable assets of the companies to satisfy investors' claims and liquidate statutory liabilities
- 2 What powers and procedural steps the constituted committee should have to identify, value, and auction properties spread across States and to effect refunds to investors
- 3 Whether interim bail should be granted to Petitioners in view of the auction and refund process
Ratio Decidendi
In view of exceptional and peculiar circumstances (long incarceration of petitioners, prolonged non-refund to investors, SEBI's practical difficulties in timebound country-wide auctions and uncertainty of criminal trials), the Court invoked Article 142 to constitute a High-Powered Sale Committee chaired by a former Supreme Court judge with specified membership, powers (including all powers of a Civil Court), duties and procedures to identify, secure, value and auction the companies' immovable assets, to deposit sale proceeds in a dedicated account and effect refunds to investors; the Court also prescribed procedures for valuation, e-auction, record custody, state cooperation, remuneration...
Court Disposition
Writ petition disposed by issuing directions under Article 142; HPSC constituted and measures prescribed to auction assets and refund investors; interim bail granted to Petitioners Nos.1 and 2
Orders
- Constitution of High-Powered Sale Committee (HPSC) chaired by Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhatt, Former Judge, Supreme Court of India, with specified members including Dr. Justice Satish Chandra, a SEBI nominee, State revenue officers, Member Secretary Pardeep Kumar Sharma (Retd.), Registrar, and Secretary from...
- HPSC directed to obtain all property documents/title deeds from SEBI/EOW/MPID Court and Sub-Registrars, create a database, digitise and uniquely number documents, and ensure properties are shown entrusted/encumbered in its favour in State land records
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment