RAMESH SANKA versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

RAMESH SANKA versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Article 32 is not an appropriate remedy for agitating any personal grievance in relation to contractual rights arising from service conditions or agreements between employee and employer; such grievances must be pursued through civil law remedies or civil suits.

Parties
Petitioner: Ramesh Sanka; Respondents: Union of India & Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
25 January 2019
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (crl.) Under Article 32 / Final Judgment
Outcome
Petition dismissed
Legal Topics
Article 32 Jurisdiction, Personal Contractual Rights, Employment Disputes
Constitutional Law Contract Law Article 32 Jurisdiction Personal Contractual Rights Employment Disputes

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ramesh Sanka

Petitioner

Union of India & Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Writ Petition (crl.) Under Article 32 / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a writ under Article 32 is maintainable to enforce personal contractual rights between an employee and employer
  2. 2 Whether grievances regarding contractual rights should be adjudicated under civil law remedies

Ratio Decidendi

Article 32 is not an appropriate remedy for agitating any personal grievance in relation to contractual rights arising from service conditions or agreements between employee and employer; such grievances must be pursued through civil law remedies or civil suits.

Court Disposition

Petition dismissed

Orders

  • Writ petition dismissed. Applicants are at liberty to pursue their grievances in accordance with law before appropriate forum.