DRAUPADI DEVI AND ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

DRAUPADI DEVI AND ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Dispute as to whether the property was private property or State property of the Ruler is barred from judicial adjudication under Article 363; no recognition of property as private property by Government of India; suit property is State property and suit is barred by limitation.

Parties
Appellants: Draupadi Devi and Others; Respondents: Union of India and Others
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
09 September 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Decision on Appeal and Writ Petition
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; suit dismissed
Legal Topics
Article 363 (act of State and Bar to Court Interference), Article 372 (pre Constitution Laws), Article 77 (authentication of Instruments), State Vs Private Property Under Instrument of Accession and Covenant, Limitation Act Section 3, Article 120, CPC Order VII Rule 1(e)

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Draupadi Devi and Others

Appellants

Union of India and Others

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Decision on Appeal and Writ Petition

  1. 1 Whether the suit property was private property of the Ruler of Kapurthala or State property
  2. 2 Jurisdiction of Courts under Article 363 to adjudicate dispute arising from pre-constitution covenants
  3. 3 Title to property based on historical developments, user, and recognition by Government of India

Ratio Decidendi

Dispute as to whether the property was private property or State property of the Ruler is barred from judicial adjudication under Article 363; no recognition of property as private property by Government of India; suit property is State property and suit is barred by limitation.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; suit dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Suit dismissed as barred by limitation