MD. ISLAM & ORS. versus THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.
The State notification of the ACP Scheme did not automatically confer rights on employees of the Bihar State Electricity Board because it excluded public undertakings and the Board validly exercised its discretion under Section 79(C) to adapt the Scheme only prospectively w.e.f. 05.04.2005 (and clarified this by notification dated 07.10.2005); absent a demonstration of mala fide or ulterior motive the Court will not interfere with the Board's choice of date, and therefore the appellants were not entitled to retrospective effect from 09.08.1999.
- Parties
- Appellants: MD. ISLAM & ORS.; Respondents: THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 23 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From the High Court of Judicature at Patna Judgment Dated 18.12.2018
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Assured Career Progression (acp) Scheme, Adaptation of State Service Rules by Statutory Boards, Date of Applicability of Service Rules, Section 79(c) of the Electricity (supply) Act, 1948
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MD. ISLAM & ORS.
Appellants
THE BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From the High Court of Judicature at Patna Judgment Dated 18.12.2018
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Bihar ACP Rules 2003 notified w.e.f. 09.08.1999 applied to employees of the Bihar State Electricity Board
- 2 Whether the respondent Board's adaptation of the ACP Scheme could be retrospective or was prospective and the correct date of applicability
- 3 Whether judicial review of the date chosen for applicability is permissible absent mala fide or ulterior motive
Ratio Decidendi
The State notification of the ACP Scheme did not automatically confer rights on employees of the Bihar State Electricity Board because it excluded public undertakings and the Board validly exercised its discretion under Section 79(C) to adapt the Scheme only prospectively w.e.f. 05.04.2005 (and clarified this by notification dated 07.10.2005); absent a demonstration of mala fide or ulterior motive the Court will not interfere with the Board's choice of date, and therefore the appellants were not entitled to retrospective effect from 09.08.1999.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with no order as to costs
- Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment