PRAMOD KUMAR SAXENA versus UNION OF !NOIA & ORS.

PRAMOD KUMAR SAXENA versus UNION OF !NOIA & ORS.

The petitioner is entitled to limited relief in the form of bail, given the special circumstances of being an under-trial prisoner for over ten years, but cannot seek consolidation of all cases or relief under Section 436A CrPC, as it does not apply retroactively.

Parties
Petitioner: Pramod Kumar Saxena; Respondents: Union of India & Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
19 September 2008
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (crl.) / Final Hearing and Decision
Outcome
Writ Petition partly allowed.
Legal Topics
Bail, Fundamental Rights, Under Trial Detention, Fraud, Consolidation of Criminal Cases

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pramod Kumar Saxena

Petitioner

Union of India & Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Writ Petition (crl.) / Final Hearing and Decision

  1. 1 Whether an under-trial prisoner detained for more than ten years is entitled to bail under Article 32 of the Constitution and Section 436A of CrPC.
  2. 2 Whether all criminal cases against the petitioner can be consolidated and tried in one court.

Ratio Decidendi

The petitioner is entitled to limited relief in the form of bail, given the special circumstances of being an under-trial prisoner for over ten years, but cannot seek consolidation of all cases or relief under Section 436A CrPC, as it does not apply retroactively.

Court Disposition

Writ Petition partly allowed.

Orders

  • If petitioner applies for bail, an appropriate court will release him on bail upon executing a bond to its satisfaction.
  • If not arrested but likely to be arrested, the Arresting Officer shall release him on bail upon executing a bond to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer.