JAMNADAS DHARAMDAS versus DR. J. JOSEPH FERREIRA AND ANR.
The Court of Small Causes, Bombay has jurisdiction under section 28 of the Bombay Rent Act to decree possession of leased land including superstructures as incidental relief. Tenant's persistent default in paying rent and taxes excludes relief under section 12(3)(b). The landlord is entitled to decree for possession, with vacant land delivered to him without the structures, and only removal of superstructure—if any—is incidental to an effective possession order.
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant Tenant: Jamnadas Dharamdas; Respondent/plaintiff Landlord: Dr. J. Joseph Ferreira
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 07 May 1980
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal by Certificate / Final Appeal From Bombay High Court Judgment Dated 23 10 1969 in S.c.a. No. 1596 of 1965
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, Jurisdiction of Court of Small Causes, Forfeiture Under Lease, Relief From Forfeiture, Mesne Profits, Superstructure Rights on Leased Land
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jamnadas Dharamdas
Appellant/defendant Tenant
Dr. J. Joseph Ferreira
Respondent/plaintiff Landlord
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal by Certificate / Final Appeal From Bombay High Court Judgment Dated 23 10 1969 in S.c.a. No. 1596 of 1965
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court of Small Causes, Bombay has jurisdiction to grant a decree for possession of leased land including superstructures under Section 28 of the Bombay Rent Act
- 2 Whether the tenant can claim relief from forfeiture of superstructures built on leased land upon repeated defaults in payment of rent and taxes
- 3 Whether relief under Section 12(3)(b) of the Bombay Rent Act can be granted in case of persistent default
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Small Causes, Bombay has jurisdiction under section 28 of the Bombay Rent Act to decree possession of leased land including superstructures as incidental relief. Tenant's persistent default in paying rent and taxes excludes relief under section 12(3)(b). The landlord is entitled to decree for possession, with vacant land delivered to him without the structures, and only removal of superstructure—if any—is incidental to an effective possession order.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Decree for possession of two plots of land Nos. 12 and 13 and buildings thereon granted.
- Decree regarding arrears of rent and mesne profits confirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment