JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS. versus ADANI POWER RAJASTHAN LTD. & ANR.
The Coal India notification dated 19.12.2017 imposing Evacuation Facility Charges constituted a 'change in law' under the PPA; Article 10.2.1's restitutionary principle entitles the generator to compensation to restore its economic position; Article 10.5.1(i) governs the effective date (the date of the notification) so compensation and carrying cost (at LPS compounding rates) are payable from that date; Article 10.5.1(ii) is inapplicable as there was no change in interpretation by a Court, Tribunal or Indian Governmental Instrumentality; the APTEL's decision was upheld and the appeal dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellants: Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. & Ors.; Respondents: Adani Power Rajasthan Ltd. & Anr.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal No. 4336 of 2025 Under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003 / Appeal to the Supreme Court; Judgment on Merits (appeal Dismissed)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Change in Law, Power Purchase Agreement, Tariff Adjustment, Evacuation Facility Charges, Late Payment Surcharge, Restitutionary Principle, Supplementary Bill
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. & Ors.
Appellants
Adani Power Rajasthan Ltd. & Anr.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal No. 4336 of 2025 Under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003 / Appeal to the Supreme Court; Judgment on Merits (appeal Dismissed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Coal India Limited's notification imposing Evacuation Facility Charges constituted a 'change in law' under the PPA
- 2 Interpretation of Article 10.2.1 vis-à-vis Article 10.5 of the PPA, specifically Article 10.5.1(ii)
Ratio Decidendi
The Coal India notification dated 19.12.2017 imposing Evacuation Facility Charges constituted a 'change in law' under the PPA; Article 10.2.1's restitutionary principle entitles the generator to compensation to restore its economic position; Article 10.5.1(i) governs the effective date (the date of the notification) so compensation and carrying cost (at LPS compounding rates) are payable from that date; Article 10.5.1(ii) is inapplicable as there was no change in interpretation by a Court, Tribunal or Indian Governmental Instrumentality; the APTEL's decision was upheld and the appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Pending application(s) disposed of
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment