DALBIR SINGH versus STATE OF U.P.

Appellate or revisional court may convict for an offence for which no charge was framed if the accused was aware of the basic ingredients and facts; conviction under Section 306 IPC is sustainable in the present case as Dalbir Singh had a fair chance to defend himself and no failure of justice occurred.

Parties: Appellant/accused: Dalbir Singh; Respondent/appellant: State of U.P.
Jurisdiction: India
Judgment Date: 08 April 2004
Procedural Posture: Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Final Disposition
Outcome: Dalbir Singh's appeal dismissed; State of U.P.'s appeal partly allowed; conviction under Section 306 IPC recorded, sentence for period already undergone.
Legal Topics: Charge Framing, Conviction Without Formal Charge, Dowry Death, Abetment of Suicide

Criminal Law Charge Framing Conviction Without Formal Charge Dowry Death Abetment of Suicide

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2

Parties

Dalbir Singh

Appellant/accused

State of U.P.

Respondent/appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Final Disposition

Legal Issues

1 Whether an accused may be convicted for an offence (Section 306 IPC) without a charge being formally framed for that offence under Section 464 CrPC

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Dalbir Singh's appeal dismissed; State of U.P.'s appeal partly allowed; conviction under Section 306 IPC recorded, sentence for period already undergone.

Orders

Dalbir Singh convicted under Section 306 IPC and sentenced to period already undergone.
Criminal Appeal No. 479/99 dismissed.