LAXMI DEVI & OTHERS versus MOHAMMAD TABBAR & ANOTHER

LAXMI DEVI & OTHERS versus MOHAMMAD TABBAR & ANOTHER

Given the age of the deceased (35 years), the increased notional income, and the low interest rate of 6%, a multiplier of 14 is appropriate instead of 12 as adopted by the High Court.

Parties
Appellants: Laxmi Devi & Others; Respondents: Mohammad Tabbar & Another
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
25 March 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision (final Judgment and Order Dated 31.8.2006 of High Court of Uttaranchal at Nainital in A.o. No. 154 of 2006)
Outcome
Appeal allowed.
Legal Topics
Claim for Compensation in Motor Accident Death, Assessment of Notional Income, Application of Multiplier in Compensation Calculation, Interest on Compensation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 13
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Laxmi Devi & Others

Appellants

Mohammad Tabbar & Another

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision (final Judgment and Order Dated 31.8.2006 of High Court of Uttaranchal at Nainital in A.o. No. 154 of 2006)

  1. 1 Whether the High Court erred in reducing the multiplier from 16 (applied by the Tribunal) to 12 while increasing notional income in compensation calculation for motor accident death case.
  2. 2 What is the appropriate multiplier to be used, given the age of the deceased and the rate of interest awarded?

Ratio Decidendi

Given the age of the deceased (35 years), the increased notional income, and the low interest rate of 6%, a multiplier of 14 is appropriate instead of 12 as adopted by the High Court.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed.

Orders

  • Compensation set at Rs. 3,45,000/- (including funeral, consortium, and estate loss).
  • Interest at 6% per annum from the date of claim petition.