UNION OF INDIA versus BIJAN GHOSH AND ORS.
Since the statutory requirements for conferring the Bharat Ratna were not fulfilled (no publication in Gazette, no entry in register, no Sanad from President), the award was not in fact conferred and thus the question of cancellation or annulment does not arise. The press communique should be treated as cancelled.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Union of India; Respondents: Buan Ghosh and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 04 August 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Special Leave Petition (civil) / Final Disposition
- Outcome
- Petition disposed of
- Legal Topics
- Conferment of Award, Cancellation of Award, Bharat Ratna, Government Notification
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Union of India
Petitioner
Buan Ghosh and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) / Final Disposition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conferment of Bharat Ratna by press communique constitutes the award under law
- 2 Whether the press communique can be recalled, rescinded, cancelled, or revoked
Ratio Decidendi
Since the statutory requirements for conferring the Bharat Ratna were not fulfilled (no publication in Gazette, no entry in register, no Sanad from President), the award was not in fact conferred and thus the question of cancellation or annulment does not arise. The press communique should be treated as cancelled.
Court Disposition
Petition disposed of
Orders
- Press communique dated 22nd January 1992 regarding Bharat Ratna to Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose stands cancelled.
- Transferred cases and petitions stand disposed of.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment